| kirby007 said: stop stealing everyone elses work prepare the flames everyone cause this dude deserves it |
lol yes. Because unlike you, toastboy isn't just a spammer ^^ - he also has been flirting with the Sony fans recently, and now as you said he stole someone else's material.
| BenVTrigger said: In all actuality no one can deny that Gears 2 has superior textures. Thats just a fact. However K2 has amazing animations / lighting / and particle effects. At then end of the day K2 looks better though I prefer Gears and its art style. K2 is the best looking console game but honestly it wasn't as good as I thought they would be when I played the demo. |
I second. Textures aren't as good, but I dare say the visuals, overall, are a smidge better than gears.
Slimebeast said:
lol yes. Because unlike you, toastboy isn't just a spammer ^^ - he also has been flirting with the Sony fans recently, and now as you said he stole someone else's material. |
hey I remember this some sort of thread made 2 days ago and its content was atleast "ok"
this is just crap
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
lol you guys are saying this is pathetic just because i have living proof that your wrong...
| toastboy44562 said: lol you guys are saying this is pathetic just because i have living proof that your wrong... |
atleast mention the original thread/person you stole this from
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
Well, I think its personal preference as to which one "you think looks better"
If your after a more colourful option then you'll prefer Gears while if you like a game with amazing motion, lighting and particle affects then you'll prefer KZ2.
I think the title for this thread is a bad one, and im thinking that toastboy hasn't really taken to Killzone.
I played the tech demo of both KZ3 and GoW3 and Gow still looks better!!1!! bwahaha!!
...ok..im done..
"Tell me why does it have to be so hard
to let go when it?s your final day
...When death is on it's way"
Killzone 2 VS Gears of War 2 through the eyes of a programmer
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=59585&page=1
"GoW2: Now, before you start sending me hate mail, I know that I cherry picked an example of a good Killzone 2 pic and a bad GoW2 one. Why does the GoW2 pic look worse? First of, notice the trees. Unlike in Killzone 2, they exist. Also, the buildings are growing organic matter and mold. The trees require quite a lot of power to render and conflict with the theme of the game.
Killzone 2: Count how much organic matter you see. Count the number of round edges. Not many, huh? This looks good, but it is just plain geometry. Geometry is very easy to render and take up very little space in memory. Also, notice the similar color scheme. The same textures are being used over and over, and although they look different, it is a result of them stacking multiple textures on top of each other."
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
