| The_vagabond7 said: Ok, this is just fucking retarded. I'm sorry to people with down syndrome for insulting you like this, but this is just getting so stupid. This is just another message board dwelling theists. He starts flaming atheists half way through, and loses credibility as their being an intelligent designer by bringing biblical accuracy into the fray.
"But here is what is worse for this theory: Atheists, aren’t you always telling us that if we can’t measure, see, touch, taste, smell, hear, interact or verify that something exists then you are being a superstitious freak to believe in it. So let me ask you this? You are postulating that there are infinite other universes out there, none of which I can measure, see, touch, taste, smell, hear, interact or verify? Aren’t you being a superstitious freak to believe that? And you want me to believe it too (some sort of evangelization to your superstitious blind faith)? I don’t think I have that much blind faith. Especially when the other alternative seams to actually have certain claims of evidences in addition to this. What I mean by that is that when I start adding other proofs to this like the Moral Argument, the Resurrection of Jesus, the accuracy of the New Testament, and so on, we see that the weight of the evidence really lies on the Theist’s view and one has to force oneself to believe in Atheism and multiple universes."
The conclusion is really good. After asserting that any mechanistic cause of the universe would in and of itself require a cause simply pushing the problem back, he turns the same reasoning on God. This is good. "Now the big question that everyone asks is: But where did God COME from? Kids ask that, atheists ask that. We ask that. In other words where the God come from and who made God?
He then goes on to offer an explanation that since there was no time before the big bang, then nothing came before god, so obviously nothing created god. He always existed. An explanation that could just as easily be applied to a mechanistic cause, and any argument against a non sentient mechanistic cause before time existed can still be leveled at god. It even shoots his earlier argument in the foot that a mechanistic cause would have to take place in the "infinity past" (as he puts it) and clearly that isn't the case because the universe isn't "infinity old", but if there was no time before the big bang, then "past" ceases to have meaning before the big bang making it perfectly within the realm of reason. This guy is a moron. Thanks for the laugh, sir, but you aren't convincing anybody but the choir of your brilliance.
Edit: He amusingly and with infinite irony that is no doubt lost on him ends with this sentence "Frankly, people who have blind faith in things that are unscientific, scare me (OK I just had to say that – but it is true)." |
Indented: That was rude.
Bold: Interesting point, but I did say to e-mail him about it instead of bashing it. I suck at debates. He is better....
Underlined: Christianity IS backed up by science and historical foundations. You would know if you did the proper research.
WHO IS JESUS REALLY?
; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for 
, let me know!
