By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - resident evil 5 ps3 vs. 360 comparison. 360 WINS!!!

Pristine20 on 04 February 2009
Neoraf said:
Gh0st4lifE said:
it's 2009 and despite a 5 gig install the PS3 still suffers from the inferior version syndrome

I'm sorry but that's really not what a high end console is supposed to offer. Blu-ray was a huuuuuuge mistake.

This.


As a PS360 owner, now I know wich version to buy: Xbox 360.

 

Dude, you would have bought the 360 version irregardless of anything on this thread. Don't act like this thread did anything to influence that opinion lol.

 



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Around the Network
irstupid on 04 February 2009

didn't check gaming forums ever last gen, just played my games so don't know how it is.

Was there a billion threads for each and ever multiplat game that gen comparing pixels, jaggies, lighting or whatever else that is so small no one is gonna care. Or did you just play the games that came to your system and not care if your hated rival got to play the same game too.



Pristine20 on 04 February 2009
eliasg said:
Best graphics this gen and 360 wins, hands down. Textures and AA is what make this comparison interesting...

killzone 2 says hi

 



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Gameboy86 on 04 February 2009

Regardless of the reasons for posting such a thread (reasons which I don't see a problem with, given that the PS3 is apparently more powerful), this post does highlight how screenshot comparisons should be done - comparing 2 identical shots, as opposed to comletely different ones and trying to determine which one looks better. I think the post deserves credit for that, if nothing else.



WarhawkRules on 04 February 2009

1.Some multi platforms look better on 360 because they were developed for 360 first and than later on PS3, because PS3 is more harder to develop.Burnout paradise looks better on PS3 because it was developed on PS3 first.

2.Some of those compresions are FAKE. They didn't use HDMI when they played PS3 versions.

3.When you play PS3 game on HD TV the game looks the SAME just like on 360. Sometimes even better.




Around the Network
WarhawkRules on 04 February 2009
Baggins said:
Kantor said:
Deneidez said:
Kantor said:
EuroGamer's never given a victory to PS3 in one of these.

We've stopped caring.

Well, first of all you are wrong.

http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/eurogamer-round-17-xbox-360-vs-ps3

Next up is The Legend of Spyro: Dawn of the Dragon and some good news on this one, the PS3 version easily trounces the Xbox 360 version.

...

Tomb Raider: Underworld is next up and once again it’s a clear winner for the PS3 with an astounding 50% increase in resolution compared to the Xbox 360.

Second, we all know which 'side' you have chosen. Third, maybe its just way it is even though some of you are in denial. PS3 has got trashed by X360 in most multiplatforms. :P

EuroGamer just gave the PS3 a round?

Wow...

First the 9 for KZ2 and R2, and now this?

I'm beginning...to like them...

PS3 does not get thrashed by 360 in most multiplats. In 95% of games, the difference, whoever it is in favour of, is miniscule and almost unnoticeable. DMC4, Oblivion and Tomb Raider Underworld look better on PS3. Fallout 3, The Orange Box and Rainbow Six Vegas all look better on 360. It's basically 50:50. CoD4, GTA4, and say Soulcalibur IV all look pretty much identical on PS3 and 360.

As for those games that do look better on a certain platform, this just reflects a focus on that platform. You can't really say the PS3 hardware is crap when it runs a game like Killzone 2, now can you? Notice how PS3 exclusives have unanimously better graphics than multiplats: Uncharted, MGS4, Killzone 2, GT5P...

No it is not equal.

910 times the multiplat looks better on the Xbox 360, please don't outright lie.

FYI, Oblivion actually looks the same with the latest update applied to the Xbox 360 version. DMC4 looks better on Xbox 360 has better post processing. Of those games listed only Tomb Raider Underworlds looks better.

The ones you listed for the Xbox 360 also look much better not just a little.

Frame rate problems in Orange Box and Rainbow Six Vegas.

Soul Calibur is also rendered at a higher res than on the PS3.

You are not a new member and I'm sure you know all this, I'm just asking that you don't deliberately misinform people.

 


Wrong. DMC 4 on PS3 has better colors than DMC 4 on 360. GTA IV looks smoother on PS3, Mercenaries 2 looks way better on PS3, as well as Beowulf. If you need the links of the comprasion just ask

ChronotriggerJM on 04 February 2009

@Baggins

It's very weird how it works actually, if you notice, games that were made on the PS3, then ported to the 360, strangely run better on the PS3 o.o; Then games that were made on the 360, then ported to the PS3 have this truly strange nature, of running better on the 360! Games that were made on the PC first, or have separate dev teams for both... have pro's and con's against each other!!!! This isn't rocket science, but at the same time, it's obviously not commons sense, no one ever seems to get the blatantly obvious.

More multi-plats run better on the 360 right? Coincidentally, more games are lead designed on the 360 >_> Fancy that.



From 0 to KICKASS in .stupid seconds.

Baggins on 04 February 2009
ChronotriggerJM said:
@Baggins

It's very weird how it works actually, if you notice, games that were made on the PS3, then ported to the 360, strangely run better on the PS3 o.o; Then games that were made on the 360, then ported to the PS3 have this truly strange nature, of running better on the 360! Games that were made on the PC first, or have separate dev teams for both... have pro's and con's against each other!!!! This isn't rocket science, but at the same time, it's obviously not commons sense, no one ever seems to get the blatantly obvious.

More multi-plats run better on the 360 right? Coincidentally, more games are lead designed on the 360 >_> Fancy that.

 

 Agree 100%

I'm not a deranged fanboy just don't like misinformation.

I was fundamentally disagreeing with Kantor saying its a 50 50 split - It isn't whichever way you look at it.



ChronotriggerJM on 04 February 2009

@Baggins, I wholeheartedly agree :P And at the same time I will say though, that they've gotten MUCH better in terms of quality. Ports aren't ghastly anymore xD



From 0 to KICKASS in .stupid seconds.

Mvp4eVa on 04 February 2009

360 has better textures and lightings , PS3 has blurry textures by comparison..

Anyway you have to switch back and foward fast between pictures and look closely to see the difference..

The edge is given to the 360..



My Trigger Happy Sixaxis controller