By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Killzone 2 better than Metal Gear Solid 4?

hah, Spankey, too true...I guess getting supposedly reported makes me hesitant to keep using the phrase.

Good call on waiting to play KZ2 before deciding, heh.



Around the Network

Phase 1: Divide the PS3 fanbase.

Phase 1: complete

Phase 2: Watch some porn

Phase 2: complete

Phase 3: build killer robot



786_ali said:
^^The hiccups he's talking about are the fact that it can't run on the 360, i mean what kinda ps3 exclusive doesn't run on the 360, why did they have to make the graphics so good

 

Heh. Usually I don't respond to such ridiculous fanboyism.


But YES, reviewers have said that Killzone 2 does have some techinical hiccups, including blurry textures, low res textures and texture pop-in. Since post MGS4 getting a 10/10, ign has become "objective, honest and truthful" as reviewers in the eyes of PS3 fanboys, it was their review that said it.

On top of that, where does it say Killzone 2 couldn't be done on 360? where is the proof, the statistical evidence that if Killzone 2 is not bigger than 8gb, that it cannot run on the 360?

That's like me saying Gears 2 couldn't run on PS3 and that's why it's not on that platform.

@CGI-Quality. I've played many games where I've not experienced techincal "hiccups". I've also played games where others have claimed were flawless and I had found noticeable faults (uncharted is the example I've runned into the ground). Why is MGS4 better graphics wise than KZ2 for me? Well, I've played through MGS4 and didn't notice a single technical hiccup (read above for what I define as a hiccup) but according to IGN (a website I trust), there exists some in Killzone 2.



Calamity, what was wrong with Uncharted?



I haven't played the game in its entirety pal. We shall see.



Around the Network

Ah yes, screen tearing. I must be blind because I can't remember noticing that in a game, so I can't say that effects my enjoyment of a game.



windbane said:
Garnett said:
windbane said:
Garnett said:
windbane said:
Garnett said:
windbane said:

Why, for agreeing with you at the end? You think people only like graphics because it's a popular franchise. I guess it's the same for all the publications that voted it the best graphics of 2008. What's the point of arguing with you when you are basically saying "what everyone thinks about the game is wrong"? To that, I say "not really." I happen to agree with what I think. but hey, thanks for the report.

Oh so NOW you wanna talk eh,you didnt agree with me you kept saying "not really"

And actually Gears 1 won best graphics in 07 so i guess they all were right to? So Gears 1 = best graphics ever? Thats your logic.

Talking to you is a waste of time because that makes no sense. Report me again. I'm sure a mod would get a good laugh out of that quote.

You said "What everyone thinks about the game is wrong" (Saying that MGS4 has great graphics and everyone agrees with it cause it won a FEW Graphic awards)

I said "And actually Gears 1 wont best graphics in 07 so i guess they were all right to? So Gears 1 = best graphics ever?" (Meaning that Graphic awards mean squat cause there handed out every year and a game cannot win the award twice.

Is that easy enough for you to understand? ? ? ?

Well, considering you said the exact same thing, this is my response as to whether what you are saying is making any sense: not really. Is english your first language (serious question)?

Why the hell did you say "Not really" all the times if you were agreeing with me? and im done cause your not staying on subject.

You're the one that branched down this path of the original topic. I'll have to play single player before I know if KZ2 is better than MGS4 in graphics.

Let's summarize: you said that MGS4 doesn't have awesome graphics like people think. If people think that, who are you to tell them they are wrong? So I say: not really. You say: care to elaborate? I say: not really, because you are saying what I think is wrong from the get go. You say: then you have no argument. I say: not really, because whatever I say you are just going to say I don't think correctly, so what argument can I have? (hence I agreed with you, saying I don't really have an argument)

Now, that said...what you followed with makes absolutely no sense. I said MGS4 won many awards for it's graphics, meaning it's not just gamers on this site that you are saying think incorrectly. You say, the previous year, that Gears of War won graphics awards and must be the best looking game ever? What? How did my logic lead to that, as you claim? Even if Gears was the best in 2007, which it couldn't have been because it came out in 2006 (as Kantor alludes to above), then how does that stop MGS4 from looking good in 2008?

 

I branched it out to try and get a response out of you and hear why you disagree.

 

I NEVER said KZ2 has better graphics than MGS4,I said MGS4 dosent have awesome graphics like people think.

 

Just cause alot of people think one thing is good does not make it true,example is GTA IV,LOTS of people loved it,yet some people hated it.(When you play a game you like you tend to find the hidden positives in the game,i for example play L4D and i realize how it has some of the best shaders,how ever you or anyone else could say im wrong,and to that person i could never be right and they could never be right in my eyes) (So people who loved the series plays MGS4 and see a awesome graphic game, while most people just see a game with medicore graphics.

 

Instead of saying "Not really" you could of said im not even going to bother or something along those lines,im not a fanboy,im not blind i see a game for what it is,but "not really" dosent help at all.It all seems like a misunderstanding.

 

I said Gears = best graphics ever confirmed? because alot of PS fanboys take MGS4 (which in my eyes has medicore graphics)and claim it as the best PS3 graphics game ever,which i find that Uncharted has alot better graphics IMO again.And on top of that they keep saying MGS4 cannot be done on 360 which is just fanboy BS.

 

 

 

 



i find it quite sad that gameplay was nearly last on your list, i know you didn'y say its prioritised, but its a sub-conscious action.



 Twilightman on Gametrailers

Garnett said:
windbane said:
Garnett said:
windbane said:
Garnett said:
windbane said:
Garnett said:
windbane said:

Why, for agreeing with you at the end? You think people only like graphics because it's a popular franchise. I guess it's the same for all the publications that voted it the best graphics of 2008. What's the point of arguing with you when you are basically saying "what everyone thinks about the game is wrong"? To that, I say "not really." I happen to agree with what I think. but hey, thanks for the report.

Oh so NOW you wanna talk eh,you didnt agree with me you kept saying "not really"

And actually Gears 1 won best graphics in 07 so i guess they all were right to? So Gears 1 = best graphics ever? Thats your logic.

Talking to you is a waste of time because that makes no sense. Report me again. I'm sure a mod would get a good laugh out of that quote.

You said "What everyone thinks about the game is wrong" (Saying that MGS4 has great graphics and everyone agrees with it cause it won a FEW Graphic awards)

I said "And actually Gears 1 wont best graphics in 07 so i guess they were all right to? So Gears 1 = best graphics ever?" (Meaning that Graphic awards mean squat cause there handed out every year and a game cannot win the award twice.

Is that easy enough for you to understand? ? ? ?

Well, considering you said the exact same thing, this is my response as to whether what you are saying is making any sense: not really. Is english your first language (serious question)?

Why the hell did you say "Not really" all the times if you were agreeing with me? and im done cause your not staying on subject.

You're the one that branched down this path of the original topic. I'll have to play single player before I know if KZ2 is better than MGS4 in graphics.

Let's summarize: you said that MGS4 doesn't have awesome graphics like people think. If people think that, who are you to tell them they are wrong? So I say: not really. You say: care to elaborate? I say: not really, because you are saying what I think is wrong from the get go. You say: then you have no argument. I say: not really, because whatever I say you are just going to say I don't think correctly, so what argument can I have? (hence I agreed with you, saying I don't really have an argument)

Now, that said...what you followed with makes absolutely no sense. I said MGS4 won many awards for it's graphics, meaning it's not just gamers on this site that you are saying think incorrectly. You say, the previous year, that Gears of War won graphics awards and must be the best looking game ever? What? How did my logic lead to that, as you claim? Even if Gears was the best in 2007, which it couldn't have been because it came out in 2006 (as Kantor alludes to above), then how does that stop MGS4 from looking good in 2008?

 

I branched it out to try and get a response out of you and hear why you disagree.

 

I NEVER said KZ2 has better graphics than MGS4,I said MGS4 dosent have awesome graphics like people think.

 

Just cause alot of people think one thing is good does not make it true,example is GTA IV,LOTS of people loved it,yet some people hated it.(When you play a game you like you tend to find the hidden positives in the game,i for example play L4D and i realize how it has some of the best shaders,how ever you or anyone else could say im wrong,and to that person i could never be right and they could never be right in my eyes) (So people who loved the series plays MGS4 and see a awesome graphic game, while most people just see a game with medicore graphics.

 

Instead of saying "Not really" you could of said im not even going to bother or something along those lines,im not a fanboy,im not blind i see a game for what it is,but "not really" dosent help at all.It all seems like a misunderstanding.

 

I said Gears = best graphics ever confirmed? because alot of PS fanboys take MGS4 (which in my eyes has medicore graphics)and claim it as the best PS3 graphics game ever,which i find that Uncharted has alot better graphics IMO again.And on top of that they keep saying MGS4 cannot be done on 360 which is just fanboy BS.

1. (black bold): I only referenced the topic of discussion so I could say I was at least addressing it in case you actually did report me. I think it's impossible to even begin to discuss which game is better until they are both released.

2. What is "true" when it comes to opinion is in the eye of each beholder. Having played all the games that are considered among the best graphical powerhouses of this generation, I feel like MGS4 is the best so far. It would seem that most publications agree with me, and yet you say "most people just see a game with mediocre graphics."

3. Judging by a certain guy's response above, perhaps I shouldn't have bothered.

4. I still have NO IDEA how Gears applies to this discussion. Gears 1 or 2? You said 2007 but neither game was released in that year. Most publications voted for MGS4 over Gears 2 and yet more people own Gears 2 so you can't just say it was because there are more fans of MGS4.

 



CGI-Quality said:
@ Garnett

I agree and disagree to extents. IMO, currently, Uncharted is the best looking PS3 game out - there's where we agree. However, in it's current form, no MGS4 could not be done on the 360. The game would have to be changed in ways to run on that platform, which Kojima has said along with Media Molecule about Little BIG Planet. I know some PS3 fans might make it seem TOTALLY impossible which is not the case. If the game is re-worked for a different console it can hapoen see: Final Fantasy XIII. But in their current states, MGS4 and LBP are PS3 exclusives that wouldn't run unless changed a bit, which in turn, would make them different games on the 360 with the same title, again see: FFXIII. Regardless it's off topic, I just wanted to give my $0.02.

Good day :)

Of course they jus cant throw it on a DVD and play it on the 360,they need to get the artcht,controls,online and ahole bunch more right and optimize it for 360,It took what 2-3 years for the PS3 version alone? who knows how long it could take.

 

 

So looks like we both agree :)