| 786_ali said: ^^The hiccups he's talking about are the fact that it can't run on the 360, i mean what kinda ps3 exclusive doesn't run on the 360, why did they have to make the graphics so good |
Heh. Usually I don't respond to such ridiculous fanboyism.
But YES, reviewers have said that Killzone 2 does have some techinical hiccups, including blurry textures, low res textures and texture pop-in. Since post MGS4 getting a 10/10, ign has become "objective, honest and truthful" as reviewers in the eyes of PS3 fanboys, it was their review that said it.
On top of that, where does it say Killzone 2 couldn't be done on 360? where is the proof, the statistical evidence that if Killzone 2 is not bigger than 8gb, that it cannot run on the 360?
That's like me saying Gears 2 couldn't run on PS3 and that's why it's not on that platform.
@CGI-Quality. I've played many games where I've not experienced techincal "hiccups". I've also played games where others have claimed were flawless and I had found noticeable faults (uncharted is the example I've runned into the ground). Why is MGS4 better graphics wise than KZ2 for me? Well, I've played through MGS4 and didn't notice a single technical hiccup (read above for what I define as a hiccup) but according to IGN (a website I trust), there exists some in Killzone 2.
