Metacritic says it's truth. If the X360 has more (about 50 to 30) exclusives, and more are ranked higher....Wouldn't that mean they're better too?

Metacritic is just a collection of opinions and don't reflect my own, as I used to play 360 a lot, and still do to a point now.

.. 360 also has the most games ranked under 50%

:p

And there probably would be a few more if I was rating them, often times the higher scores are due to hype and because I usually go into a game without the hype to blind me I usually end up thinking "is this it?" especially with those games that only have a 6 hour singleplayer... 60 dollars and only 6 hours I get so mad at that point.

The 360 was out a year earlier, and it's funny that there are alot more flop games on the 360 aswell.... All in all.. I think the ps3 and 360 are pretty even.

LOL. Don't let shio see this post :P

That's very true.  Consider the first year of the PS3's life.  It had absolutely no good games.  The only decent game it had was Resistance, and since no other good games were on the PS3 for a comparison, it got higher scores than deserved.  So I guess if we take off the first year of the 360, we should take off the first awful year for Sony so they feel better to.

Seriously, all Ninja and Groucho have done on this thread is try to make pointless arguments because they themselves favor the PS3 and will do anything to put a damper on a thread that favors the 360.  Your argumetns are so small and irrelevant to the subject at hand, as pointed out many times, so please stop and let the real thread topics be discussed.

@Chrizum-Adding the Wii would be a daunting task on top of how much work I'm already putting into this. The PS3 was really used more as a comparison point because the argument was always that PS3 has more exclusives when you take away the 360/PC games. The Wii never came into the conversation. I'll think about it though.

@Kylie-Hehe...you're asking for a lot. I wasn't going to actually make a third list of them all together. I was just going to combine the numbered totals. Just like Chrizum's suggestion though I'll think about it. I just know that'll make the OP very, very long.

Everybody, I don't mind constructive criticism, but I feel like I'm getting more general complaining just for the sake of complaining. I've had people here like Groucho and Kylie, amongst others that have not fully agreed with this but have acknowledged it and want to help make it even more accurate. I don't mind that at all. I welcome that. If all you want to do is twist the data and add in assumptions, then you may as well not bother coming in here, because you aren't getting your wish. I will only change the OP based on other data. There will be no assumptions honored.

I'm going to get to work on Part 2 now. XBLA vs. PSN games.

I have a daunting feeling psn will do better than expected.

Good job, I never really paid any attention to this stuff, but it is interesting to know.