I have wired run for both my Wii and PS3 even though they both have wi-fi built in. I would gladly paid less for PS3 and Wii if they have the Wi-fi remove, because using wi-fi for on-line gaming and download just doesn't make sense.

MS get away with charging $100.00 because people don't know better and paid for them, just like there are many people that bought Sony HDMI cable for $60.00 for their PS3.

Pretty Sad or Genius?

I mean the point of marketing is to get people talking about your system, word of mouth, exposure...

It's what companies spend millions of dollars on every year..

And like some of these threads... it's free advertising.

The Almighty Microsoft is really mad ( or jelaous ) at Sony. They need to answer to everything Sony says. YES, i would rather have a console which is 200$ more expensive and it can last over 10 years than have a console which is 200$ cheaper and die after 6 months of use

and I DO use Wi Fi. I don't need wires all over my TV. This ain't 20 century anymore

Which in the following picture is Microsoft and Sony?

 That depends. If you are asking about video game industry i would have to say Sony is bigger dog. If you are asking about other products (or example:Microsoft windows and Sony's Bravia) i would have to say MS is bigger dog (for now)

But which dog has the ball in the mouth right now? :P

What's that have to do with this theard?

I think he was referring to your "MS is Jealous of Sony" remark..

And that the "Ball" represents metaphorically this Gen (between 360 and PS3),  that the ball is in MS's court.. and Sony is trying to get it back..

Thats what I got from it anyway.

That is what I got from it as well.