Zlejedi said: c0rd said: dolemit3 said: Skittles said: Groucho said: hy is this a surprise? The number of PS3s in Japan easily tops the number of 360s. Of course it would be the largest HD JRPG in Japan ever released... its like.. the PS3's first JRPG. (I don't count Folklore and VC as traditional JRPGs) Why haven't Wii JRPGS sold tons then Because the Wii owners, unlike the PS3 owners don't care less for JRPGs. Mario games only for them. Haven't you noticed why DMJ had to include the "HD" JRPG as a conditional? Dragon Quest Swords: The Masked Queen and the Tower of Mirrors Square Enix 0.50m Pokemon Batoru Reboryūshon Nintendo 0.31m Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World Namco Bandai 0.22m WKC has yet to top any of these. It will overtake the Tales spinoff next week, but lifetime against Pokemon should be close. It doesn't have a chance at the Dragon Quest spinoff. Big name JRPG's on the Wii will sell, period. Have we already forgotten the announcement that DQX is arriving on the Wii? edit: Forgot to mention MH3. Only Mario on the Wii, right? OT: Sales are a little better than I expected, not bad. Still, the PS3 hasn't quite yet proven it can sell JRPG's better than the 360 worldwide, which was the argument (I thought) some of the "Xbots" claimed, one I agree with. As for people calling Square-Enix idiots for putting their games on the 360, I'm not sure what to think... if you're implying WKC showed the PS3 is a more viable JRPG platform, I suggest looking at the Wii's DQ spinoff, which opened at 310k first week over a year ago.   I think those 3 wii examples prove that Wii sells jRPG badly :) WKC at ToS level after 1 week and should easily catch up to Pokemon in next month, only Dragon Quest might be out of reach

The examples only prove that there are no high budget JRPGs on Wii yet. I'm sure Dragon Quest Swords costed less than 20% of WKC to develop. Next year we can judge sales of Wii JRPGs. I can guarantee you that Wii will have most best selling RPGs by the end of 2009 and will be the console of choice for JRPGs.

FYI some of the RPGs for next year on Wii (every fan of the genre might want to consider a wagglebox):

RPG

Fragile: Farewell Ruins of the Moon

Muramasa: Demon Blade

Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles: The Crystal Bearer

Kizuna

Dynamic Slash

Little King Story

Romance of the Three Kingdoms XI

Valhalla Knights: Eldar Saga

Monster Hunter 3

Arc Rise Fantasia

BengaBenga said: Zlejedi said: c0rd said: dolemit3 said: Skittles said: Groucho said: hy is this a surprise? The number of PS3s in Japan easily tops the number of 360s. Of course it would be the largest HD JRPG in Japan ever released... its like.. the PS3's first JRPG. (I don't count Folklore and VC as traditional JRPGs) Why haven't Wii JRPGS sold tons then Because the Wii owners, unlike the PS3 owners don't care less for JRPGs. Mario games only for them. Haven't you noticed why DMJ had to include the "HD" JRPG as a conditional? Dragon Quest Swords: The Masked Queen and the Tower of Mirrors Square Enix 0.50m Pokemon Batoru Reboryūshon Nintendo 0.31m Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World Namco Bandai 0.22m WKC has yet to top any of these. It will overtake the Tales spinoff next week, but lifetime against Pokemon should be close. It doesn't have a chance at the Dragon Quest spinoff. Big name JRPG's on the Wii will sell, period. Have we already forgotten the announcement that DQX is arriving on the Wii? edit: Forgot to mention MH3. Only Mario on the Wii, right? OT: Sales are a little better than I expected, not bad. Still, the PS3 hasn't quite yet proven it can sell JRPG's better than the 360 worldwide, which was the argument (I thought) some of the "Xbots" claimed, one I agree with. As for people calling Square-Enix idiots for putting their games on the 360, I'm not sure what to think... if you're implying WKC showed the PS3 is a more viable JRPG platform, I suggest looking at the Wii's DQ spinoff, which opened at 310k first week over a year ago.   I think those 3 wii examples prove that Wii sells jRPG badly :) WKC at ToS level after 1 week and should easily catch up to Pokemon in next month, only Dragon Quest might be out of reach The examples only prove that there are no high budget JRPGs on Wii yet. I'm sure Dragon Quest Swords costed less than 20% of WKC to develop. Next year we can judge sales of Wii JRPGs. I can guarantee you that Wii will have most best selling RPGs by the end of 2009 and will be the console of choice for JRPGs. FYI some of the RPGs for next year on Wii (every fan of the genre might want to consider a wagglebox): RPG   Fragile: Farewell Ruins of the Moon     Muramasa: Demon Blade     Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles: The Crystal Bearer   Kizuna     Dynamic Slash   Little King Story       Romance of the Three Kingdoms XI   Valhalla Knights: Eldar Saga     Monster Hunter 3   Arc Rise Fantasia

Maybe Monster Hunter 3 and the Last one and the Final fantasy might strengthen the Wii's RPG front but it is by NO means the JRPG console because the rest look honestly mediocre. Most of them will probably get over looked due to the release of Final Fantasy XIII which is still exclusive in japan on PS3. 

Million that is in game it was already shown in the trailer.

I've always wondered why it is people obsessed with graphically intensive consoles seem to have the graphical knowledge of a toddler.  How do you people honestly have trouble telling the difference between pre-rendered and in-game?

Other notes on this topic: ShadowSoldier anyone who says Muramasa and Kizuna look mediocre instantly loses all cred as a JRPG fan. The others I can certainly understand might not be for everyone, since they are somewhat niche concepts, but no one will ever take you seriously when you make a statement like that.

that trailer doesn't include the picture in question , and in my defense if i am wrong it's a very small pic.

The trailer has that city, of not that exact vista.  It's not that small a pic either.  It's really not that hard to tell CGI when you see it.