naznatips said:
Well first, the part I highlighted. Of course an inattentive parent could take a 15 year old to see Saw. They could also buy it on DVD for them, even if it was NC-17. You can not take away the reponsibility of parents. It's simply not possible. Second, you want something to differentiate between Halo and Gears, but age ratings are not that. Information on video games is available to any who seek it. Yes, Gears may be more inappropriate for kids than Halo is, but both are inappropriate. If you are going to buy your child a game rated too old for them it's your responsibility to find out more about that game. The ESRB is telling parents that these games are not appropriate for their kids. If the parents decide to buy those games, the parents need to find out WHY they got those ratings and what the content in the games is. The internet is there for a reason. Don't have the internet? Well there are public libraries you can go to to use the internet as well. Although this obviously is not the same thing, I think it should apply here as well: Ignorance of the law is not a defense. You can not take away the peoples' rights to make a decision. Polls have shown that more than 75% of this country can't recognize key differences between the two politcal parties, but we still let them vote. You are trying to take these games out of reach of the consumers simply because they might be bought by idiots who don't know what's in them. If you want a more detailed rating system, that's fine, but the AO rating bans games from being published, and that really makes no sense at all. In summary: Both games are inappropriate. This is marked clearly on the cover of the box. You are making a decision to ignore that fact. Therefore, it is your responsibility to know why that game is not appropriate for your child, when the information is clearly available, not the company's to keep rating games higher and higher so that you know just how inappropriate it is. If you were asking for a more detailed rating system, with more steps in the process, I would understand and maybe see a purpose in this, but what you are requesting is simply ridiculous and would be an abuse of the current system. |
I think you're misinterpreting my agrument. I see it this way:
There is a great a difference between the maturity of the game experiences given by Halo 3 and Gears of War as there is between those given by Halo 3 and Metroid Prime 3. Metroid Prime 3 is T, Halo 3 is M, Gears of War ought to be AO. If the AO rating has already been corrupted into "UNCLEAN!", then I recognize that reality; this is about the principle of the thing. (Similar to the way we let Fox News viewers into the ballot booth.)
I take exception to the idea that the proposition that a game rating category should NOT be doomed to never, ever be used (since all 3 console manufacturers have stated that there is no place on their systems for AO games) should be called abuse.
Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys:
; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for
, let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia. Thanks WordsofWisdom!








