By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - i am buying this hd tv in a month want opinions

Jo21 on 26 December 2008

SONY S07-KDL32M4000

• LCD 32'
• Resolution 1.366 x 768 píxeles
• BRAVIA Engine 2™
• Digital Filter 3D
• Retro ilumination CCFL
• Advanced Contrast Enhancer (ACE)
• Dynamic Contrast: 9.000:1 , Screen Contrast:
2.500:1
• Sintonizador ATSC builtin
• Clock and Event List (one element)
• input HDMI: 2 posteriores; PC (D-sub 15): 1 posterior;
video por componente (Y, Pb, Pr): 2 posteriores; S-Video:
1 posterior; A/V: 1 posterior, 1 lateral; audio: 4 posteriores,
1 lateral; RF: 1; audífono: 1 lateral
• output: audio digital coaxial, 1 posterior; audio, 1
posterior
• Bravia® Theatre Sync™ (HDMI-CEC)
• something to put on the wall and some VESA norms.

 

i quickly translate it, due my country taxes it will pay up 600$ how it is?

 

 

 



Around the Network
akuma587 on 26 December 2008

Its decent, but its nothing spectacular.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

colonelstubbs on 26 December 2008

Id say that veering towards just above mid level quality....



I hope my 360 doesn't RRoD
         "Suck my balls!" - Tag courtesy of Fkusmot

lestatdark on 26 December 2008

For 600$ i think you could find a better deal for a 32" tv. I've found out that the LG or SAMSUNG LCD's give a better contrast ratio, up to 30000:1 for the same price. Do you live in europe? if so i think i can find you a better deal (i live in portugal.)



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"

jrod824 on 26 December 2008

I would go on CNET.com and pull up a review on that before you buy it.



Around the Network
BHR-3 on 26 December 2008

Just to let u know unless it's a sony xbr series the M series only has 3 picture options i would wait a little longer as sony will come out with 32'' with a better contrast ratio in 09 the sony tuner is'nt to fast either taking bout 3-5 sec to change channels look into Pannisonic or LG or Samsung those also have 4 pic options and a faster tuner



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

coolestguyever on 26 December 2008

well you can't go wrong with a Sony tv



Jo21 on 26 December 2008

well in comparison to a samsung similar price, it looked more colorful

http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/sony-bravia-kdl-32m4000/4505-6482_7-32815325.html

sadly i live in latin america not many TV similar priced.
this lg is cheaper but not sure if going to look better than sony one
contrast it's better
http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/lg-32lg30/4507-6482_7-32915936.html

* Diagonal Size 32 in - Widescreen
* Technology TFT active matrix
* Resolution 1366 x 768
* Display Format 720p
* Image Aspect Ratio 16:9
* Dynamic Contrast Ratio 12000:1
* Brightness (cd/m2) 500
* Progressive Scan Progressive scanning (line doubling)
* Widescreen Modes 16:9, Just, Zoom
* Viewing Angle 178 degrees
* Viewing Angle (Vertical) 178 degrees
* Pixel Response Time 5 ms
* Display Menu Language French, English, Spanish
* Backlight Life 60,000 hour(s)
* V-Chip Control Yes
* Picture Adjustment Standard/Cinema/Vivid
* Additional Features V-Chip , On-screen menu , Channel labeling , Parental control , XD Engine technology , Video noise reduction , Digital MPEG Noise Reduction Circuit , Intelligent Room Illumination Sensor (IRIS)

 

as for TV i have SD TV resolution 640 x 480p, but main use it's ps3 via component cable.

things that are i care the most its picture quality and life i think lg is sounding nicer.

out of those tv which one it's better for me?



Jo21 on 26 December 2008

well its between those 2, the sony have a 3 year warranty on dead pixels.

not sure about the LG.