My computer struggles with Crysis (20-30 FPS on medium) so I was wondering if I should even bother with Warhead or Far Cry 2. Thanks!
Here's a video from my band's last show Check out more (bigger) videos here http://www.youtube.com/user/icemanout
Warhead is a tiny bit less demanding than the original.
About FC2, I think it's well below Crysis in graphics, and I've heard the Dunia engine is less demanding than Cryengine 2.
| fazz said: Warhead is a tiny bit less demanding than the original. About FC2, I think it's well below Crysis in graphics, and I've heard the Dunia engine is less demanding than Cryengine 2. |
True. Although Far Cry 2 is a lot less demanding than Crysis, I really think the graphics are at least as nice. Yes, I can see that Crysis uses slightly more detailed textures and objects, but personally I just don't like the Crysis graphics as much as I love Far Cry 2. Crysis graphics are too grany and pixelated.
Far Cry 2 is a beatiful game.
| Avalach21 said: My computer struggles with Crysis (20-30 FPS on medium) so I was wondering if I should even bother with Warhead or Far Cry 2. Thanks! |
You should be OK with either title. If you're already getting up to 30 fps on Crysis with medium settings, you should either get better frames or can utilize better graphic settins for either game and remain playable.
The rEVOLution is not being televised
Warhead uses same graphics engine as Crysis but is optimised better apparently so runs a good 20%+ better at any equivalent detail level.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
