what one do you think is better and why

in my opinion call of duty world at war is better because i love the dogs it was a great idea to replace the chopper with dogs

I like both of them

weapons in COD4 are better(due to modern warfare)

the story is similar (one WWII the other modern warfare)

music is better in COD5

COD5 is a bit longer has split screen and online co-op in the campaign

COD 4 feels abit fresher


at the end both are very similar and very good.

COD4=9.7
COD5=9.3

i did like the weapons more in COD4

Both close, like zombies tho :D

I never really got into COD4. However my favorite multiplayer modes from World at War aren't in 4 at all, so I can safely say I would probably prefer the new one over the oldier, smellier, stinkier, better sellier, 2007ier titlier.

 LOL it true

I gotta say World at War because of the nazi zombies

Cod 4, because im bored of ww2, and the kill rewards on cod4 were far better (uav, airstrike, chopper)

I like both really, the weapons are better in CoD4, but World at War has badass Russian singing! And hey I'm a pyro so I like seeing people/things burn BURN BURRRRRN MUAHAHA!!!! Yeah I like the flamethrower if you can't tell.

Then I think WaW is better balanced due to artillery isn't as fast and cheap as air strike or as wide spread, then dogs are more balanced then the helicopter cause you may never see the helicopter and just randomly die and it takes a while to take down with a normal gun, while dogs you can hear coming and knife them to death.