By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - GTA4 360 exclusive DLC good/bad?

stovo on 24 December 2008

Im not sure that history means much to Rockstar. Money clearly means much more. lol



Help I cant get my trophy card to work.

Around the Network
SMcc1887 on 24 December 2008

I dont give a shit about GTA DLC. Microsoft choose to pay 50million for it, Sony choose to invest their cash into new games. Although MS probably made a smart business decision, id rather have a game like LBP being created for me than some DLC.



dogsforlife on 24 December 2008
magik10 said:
stovo said:
Lol no PS3 just has blu ray and more CPU power needed for these games

 

lol no. you're clueless. lol

LOL

 



Skeeuk on 24 December 2008
Legend11 said:
stovo said:
Legend11 said:
stovo said:
What are your views? I think it suck as I own only PS3 and there is no reason why not to put on PS3.

I feel the same way about MGS4 and Heavy Rain.  It's good to see that we agree in matters like this.

 

But 360 couldnt physically play those games but PS3 can play DLC for GTA4

 

Really why couldn't the 360 handle those games?  If the 360 is so weak why is it able to handle 90+% of all multi-platform games better than the PS3? 

its nothing to do with ps3 not handling them..............its developer side of things. i hate when ppl bring that lie up.

 



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Skeeuk on 24 December 2008

what puzzles me is that they sold shit loads of gta4 and got 50mil off microsoft albiet in 2 payments.......and they are in somewhat dire straights?



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Around the Network
Seece on 24 December 2008
stovo said:
Im not sure that history means much to Rockstar. Money clearly means much more. lol

 

Are you serious? yes money means a hell of a lot more. Rockstar is a business and money comes first for every business. You're a joke.



 

dogsforlife on 24 December 2008
seece said:
stovo said:
Im not sure that history means much to Rockstar. Money clearly means much more. lol

 

Are you serious? yes money means a hell of a lot more. Rockstar is a business and money comes first for every business. You're a joke.

 

 LOL



ymeaga1n on 24 December 2008
seece said:
stovo said:
Im not sure that history means much to Rockstar. Money clearly means much more. lol

 

Are you serious? yes money means a hell of a lot more. Rockstar is a business and money comes first for every business. You're a joke.

Are you quoting the wrong post? I think you should be quoting STAGE. You're saying the same thing stovo is. 

 




Omega_Phazon_Pirate. on 24 December 2008

"Gears2 dev said the game pushes the 360 to limit graphically, no such thing has been said for a PS3 game."

I could be wrong here, but didn't MGS4 do that? Or push most of it? Someone correct me please, because I am curious on this.

Also, didn't Uncharted only push like 20% of what the PS3 is capable of?



                           

Seece on 24 December 2008
ymeaga1n said:
seece said:
stovo said:
Im not sure that history means much to Rockstar. Money clearly means much more. lol

 

Are you serious? yes money means a hell of a lot more. Rockstar is a business and money comes first for every business. You're a joke.

Are you quoting the wrong post? I think you should be quoting STAGE. You're saying the same thing stovo is. 

 

Yeah I completly miss-read his post, my apologies to Stovo.