By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - Weekly poll - Nov. 26th

A grade is a grade, a rank is a rank, percentages are a proven method



Around the Network
Khuutra said:
The more specific your scale is, the more absolute a statement of quality it is, and the more problematic that is.

 

This.

I like a 5-point scale, and it was my original choice. However, I must say I'm becoming increasingly infatuated with the idea of a 2-point scale (thumbs up/thumbs down) as an absolute statement of opinion (rather than an absolute statement of quality).



ramuji
www.ramuji.com
Nintendo Network ID: ramuji
Wii Friend Code: 8543-1141-9403-8457
3DS Friend Code: 1633-4130-0140
PS3 ID: ramuji_69

That doesn't even make sense! There can't bee an "error" in a scoring system, because that implies that you think something that isn't in the score!

YOU
CANNOT
BE
SERIOUS



Khuutra said:
That doesn't even make sense! There can't bee an "error" in a scoring system, because that implies that you think something that isn't in the score!

YOU
CANNOT
BE
SERIOUS

 

 is giving a game 4 out of 5 the same as giving it a PRECISE score of 80%, no its not , and its logical



Ronster316 said:
Khuutra said:
That doesn't even make sense! There can't bee an "error" in a scoring system, because that implies that you think something that isn't in the score!

YOU
CANNOT
BE
SERIOUS

 

 is giving a game 4 out of 5 the same as giving it a PRECISE score of 80%, no its not , and its logical

 

Precision in scoring is bad. It's not logical unless we accept the idea that there is an objective scale of quality to be considered.

There isn't.



Around the Network
Khuutra said:
Ronster316 said:
Khuutra said:
That doesn't even make sense! There can't bee an "error" in a scoring system, because that implies that you think something that isn't in the score!

YOU
CANNOT
BE
SERIOUS

 

 is giving a game 4 out of 5 the same as giving it a PRECISE score of 80%, no its not , and its logical

 

Precision in scoring is bad. It's not logical unless we accept the idea that there is an objective scale of quality to be considered.

There isn't.

 

 Precision = accuracy............ bottom line_________________

ie, i was here at this precise and accurate time.



There is no objective scale of quality for video games. Trying to be "precise" is at best pedantic and at worst stifling concerning dialogue as to what makes a game good.



Khuutra said:
There is no objective scale of quality for video games. Trying to be "precise" is at best pedantic and at worst stifling concerning dialogue as to what makes a game good.

Dailogue with a percentage at the end satisfies me more than any A+/B- or 5/5 could ever do



What satisfies you is not what constitutes a proper scoring system.



Khuutra said:
What satisfies you is not what constitutes a proper scoring system.

 

So what exactly is the best scoring/grading system?