Soriku said:
Of course. Why would it? It'll be on the Wii ^_^ |
Exactly! There wasn't a doubt in my mind.......
*Cyber high-five*
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
wow, some really shocking comments in this thread lol. sony have lost this generation, but it doesn't mean they're out for good. if that was the case then nintendo shouldn't be here either. somebody mentioned in this thread that sony out of the gaming market is better for every gamer. that's just plain stupid. each of these companies make a console that appeals to somebody, that's why people are buying them. more competition = better for every gamer imo.
there will obviously be another generation of consoles, which i think will be far more competitive than this one.
| DOATS1 said: wow, some really shocking comments in this thread lol. sony have lost this generation, but it doesn't mean they're out for good. if that was the case then nintendo shouldn't be here either. somebody mentioned in this thread that sony out of the gaming market is better for every gamer. that's just plain stupid. each of these companies make a console that appeals to somebody, that's why people are buying them. more competition = better for every gamer imo. there will obviously be another generation of consoles, which i think will be far more competitive than this one. |
Exactly. Sony may have started lazy but then they released some excellent games like Uncharted, LBP, Ratchet and Clank, Motorstorm are just to name a few.
End of '08 predictions (made by theprof00): PS3: 20m, 360: 23.5m, wii: 42m
Now Playin': PS3|Resistance 2, LBP, Uncharted and Fifa 09, PSP| Ratchet and Clank: Size matters, 360| Gears of war 2 and Fallout 3.
| BengaBenga said: Here it is. It's really bad. Mind you, this is in a time where the vg-industry is experiencing extraordinary growth.
|
Wonder how many of those publishers (and I would say Sony and Microsoft are making money on the software side anyway) will be approaching being in the black after 12/31/2008.
Its libraries that sell systems not a single game.
| DOATS1 said: wow, some really shocking comments in this thread lol. sony have lost this generation, but it doesn't mean they're out for good. if that was the case then nintendo shouldn't be here either. somebody mentioned in this thread that sony out of the gaming market is better for every gamer. that's just plain stupid. each of these companies make a console that appeals to somebody, that's why people are buying them. more competition = better for every gamer imo. there will obviously be another generation of consoles, which i think will be far more competitive than this one. |
Wtf are you talking about? Did you know that even gamecube was profitable? Nintendo has been pissing gold since it came to market(And before that as a toy company.). Sometimes it doesn't do it all the time, but hey it doesn't throw money for enlargement pumps etc.
(Hopefully you understand the figures of speech I am using here. :D)
Deneidez said:
Wtf are you talking about? Did you know that even gamecube was profitable? Nintendo has been pissing gold since it came to market(And before that as a toy company.). Sometimes it doesn't do it all the time, but hey it doesn't throw money for enlargement pumps etc. (Hopefully you understand the figures of speech I am using here. :D) |
wft are you talking about? what does my comment have to do with profits? people are saying in this thread that because sony are last that they are going to get kicked out of the market, and that the market would be better without sony. what i was saying was that if coming last meant you were relegated, then nintendo shouldn't be here. sony are down, but they're not out.
this gen is lost to them, but they aren't going anywhere.
Deneidez said:
Wtf are you talking about? Did you know that even gamecube was profitable? Nintendo has been pissing gold since it came to market(And before that as a toy company.). Sometimes it doesn't do it all the time, but hey it doesn't throw money for enlargement pumps etc. (Hopefully you understand the figures of speech I am using here. :D) |
I think his "comeback" refers to marketshare not profit as in going from "last place" to "first place". M$ was widely regarded as 2nd place last gen but we all know that they didn't make anything but losses in their gaming division last gen.
Also, to all the "ps3 is doomed" whistleblowers on these threads, I gotta ask you something: would you consider the ps3 dead if there was no other console to compare it to i.e if it was selling a steady 200,000 WW at $400 and there was no wii or 360?
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler
Wow, 360 outsold the ps3 in NA by 100k. The wii did great as always in NA.
TO GOD BE THE GLORY
thx1139 said:
Wonder how many of those publishers (and I would say Sony and Microsoft are making money on the software side anyway) will be approaching being in the black after 12/31/2008. |
If memory serves me correctly, Microsoft has made over $500,000,000 this year (Q3 2007-Q3 2008), so that'd put them in the upper eschelons of profitable video game companies.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
can we get an updated version of that chart?
nintendo fanboy, but the good kind
proud soldier of nintopia
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
