You guys....Type to much, but well done @ the above poster, its true PS3 exclusives DOES push out more of the bad guys then the 360 does without lag OR glitchs, though again the _____ would just deny such a thing.
You guys....Type to much, but well done @ the above poster, its true PS3 exclusives DOES push out more of the bad guys then the 360 does without lag OR glitchs, though again the _____ would just deny such a thing.
more enemies on screen, more space on disc for textures, more cpu power. If the having all this really makes ps3 games superior, then it's a shame the consumer doesn't realize it, because it's not translating into sales.
Perhaps the 360 is capable of higher quality games than many people here believe. At least consumers appear to think so.
selnor said: READ THIS. IT'S OBJECTIVE, HAS PROOF FROM IBM THEMSELVES AND WELL ACTUAL PROOF RATHER THAN SPECULATION. BECAUSE NUMBERS GET THROWN AROUND AND PEOPLE SEEM TO FORGET THE REALITY OF HOW THE PS3 and 360 WORK AS A WHOLE INCLUDING THE OS USAGE. Here's proof that the ps3's so called Cell advantage is very misleading by Sony:
I have shown actual evidence and provided easy to follow logic. |
If a company lies they can be sued for false advertisement,and i dont see MS being sued for that,cause on the site is "Most powerful game console".
forevercloud3000 said: I have yet to see a game on 360 that produces as many enemies on screen as Heavenly Sword with as few graphical glitches as it does. You literally can see 400 enemies on screen rushing towards you, each with their own corresponding AI. From what I hear, L4D is good.........but not THAT good. Resistance 2 yields 60 multiplayer matches with almost zero lag(at least not becuz of the number of players). Gears of War 2 is said to have blank number of enemies on screen at one time, yet from what I have seen the game sacrifices draw distance for high res textures(whether that is good or bad is up to you). |
And dead rising?
http://tech2.in.com/media/images/img_221_DR1.jpg
http://www.insidesocal.com/videogames/images/dedrise.JPG
vs
http://z-o-g.org/wp-content/gallery/heavenly-sword/hs-1.jpg
(And how about Medieval 2: Total war? Theres thousands of ppl on the field at the same time. A bit older game...
Of course theres also Rome: Total war, which is even older...
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2004/reviews/589390_20040823_screen002.jpg )
Anyway controlling such amount of enemies isn't that hard. Rendering them is. Thats why such games usually use sprites to render them. If you check out the heavenly sword picture, you can see how all enemies look just about same and are about in same position. Thats probably because they are 2D images. :)
If PS2 could do it in some level, why wouldn't current consoles?
http://ps2media.gamespy.com/ps2/image/article/697/697040/hitman-blood-money-20060319083532290.jpg
...
The thing is that different games are always very different.
@Seraphic_Sixaxis
In regular terms, yes they are, but once the blu-ray Hi res texture method is put into play for the PS3 no, not by a longshot.
If theres a such thing, why they haven't used it yet? PS3 memory is limited and best way to increase it slightly is to use HD. :)
CGI-Quality said: ^^ There were times in Dead Rising that the game glitched up. This was not found in Resistance 2 or Heavenly Sword. |
What about Ninety Nine Nights?
http://images.techtree.com/ttimages/story/75215_n3.jpg
Far more enemys on screen than that,i just couldnt find them.
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
In regular terms, yes they are, but once the blu-ray Hi res texture method is put into play for the PS3 no, not by a longshot. But since only like what? ONE game has done this i wont go on because not many has even given any effort to learn this style of Res and graphics control. But when they do, i'll let you be the judge once a game or IF a game like that for the PS3 comes out. |
Except the PS3 doesn't have enough RAM to use these hi-res Blu-Ray textures
Never argue with idiots
They bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience
Garnett said:
What about Ninety Nine Nights?
http://images.techtree.com/ttimages/story/75215_n3.jpg
Far more enemys on screen than that,i just couldnt find them. |
Or kameo?
http://files.xboxic.com/xbox-360/kameo-elements-of-power/kameo-review3.jpg
This all shows nicely how you really can't say in this matter that one has advantage over another... :)
This really needs to stop , the differences between the PS3 & 360 are neglible at best arguing about which is better with figures alone doesn't give a full account of which is more powerful , if you use games as comparison that's really only subjective and useless for any conclusive argument .
Maybe you can bring this argument up near the end of their respective life cycles as see if there is a gap between the games consoles can produce then.
Million said: This really needs to stop , the differences between the PS3 & 360 are neglible at best arguing about which is better with figures alone doesn't give a full account of which is more powerful , if you use games as comparison that's really only subjective and useless for any conclusive argument . Maybe you can bring this argument up near the end of their respective life cycles as see if there is a gap between the games consoles can produce then. |
I agree,but its only the PS fans yelling about how great there system is,the Wii,360 fans know how great there system is..
AMIRITE?
@Garnett considering the thread was started by a 360 fan I don't think you are so "rite".