I agree with you that that's not realy an acceptable way to act either. People's opinions on games are their own. You can't tell someone else they shouldn't like something, because your opinions are not theirs. Yes, people should freely express their opinions, they shouldn't insult others while doing it though. I am not a mod, and I did not ban him, but I'm pretty sure the reason nonquihote was banned is he has a history of offensive posts and has been warned in the past. Carlos may get a bit fanatical at times, but he does not have a posting history of insults and flames.

1) How can you say nothing is better than MGS or FF when neither are even out yet? We've got some trailers from one game and a video of someone playing for the other. Not to mention all the other games that are unreleased that could be much better than those two.

2) SE is already supporting Nintendo more than Sony, Kojima has stated he wants to work on the Wii after MGS is finished, and Insomniac is a small time developer. I would hardly call those three "unbeatable" especially when two of them aren't really on Sony's side.

3) Long planned life span does not mean largest market share. In fact, it's more likely to be the other way around, in that having the most market share will give your console the longest life.

4) You can go to hell, I want the profits! 

1 - Trailors are better then wii game trailors thats how.

2 - FF13, FF Versus, Last Remnant.  Wheres that bigger support?

3 - PS3 advanced hardware means long life.

4 - make your peace with god omg, your ass is grass.

I can't tell you how many trailers I have spent hours playing... Seriously, a pre-rendered trailer tells you little to nothing about the game.

 Not being wii crazy is offensive, well i guess to some yes.  Why is it ok to point out PS3 weaknesses and why it wont win yet its not ok to do the same for the wii.  For gods sake the wiis hardware is weak and the PS3 is pricey those are damn facts. 

Yet thers a double standerd. 

Killzone3 said:

-have the best games

PS3 already does, nothing is better then MGS or FF.

1. PS3 doesnt have those games yet, the first statement is out.

2. MGS and FF are not the highest ranked series on GR or MC, the second statement is out.

-the biggest third party support

PS3 already does - SE Kojima Insomniacs, unbeatable.

Three publishers, one of whom (SE) is speading the love around? Thats hardly huge third party support is it?

-largest market share

PS3, long planed life span.

Life span is dictated by success. If the PS3 doesnt achieve more success it wont have a 10 year life span.

-make the most money

ME, Microsoft Sony Nintendo can go to hell!!!

Hah, you? Everyone knows I will make the most money!

@All.

Its rude to say that the PS3 sucks as much as it is rude to say the Wii sucks. Saying that the Wii hardware is weak is perfectly okay (in the right situation of course) as long as you dont come up with bullshit like that its only slightly more powerful than a GC and the same power as an Xbox (who came up with that shit anyway?).

Basically you have to tell the truth and half the shit flinging that goes to the Wii isnt the truth - its the equivelant of me saying the cheapest PS3 is $800.

Wii fans have been banned for shit flinging at the PS3 as well - GBallzack is a very notable example of this.

Edit:

1 - Trailors are better then wii game trailors thats how.

Really? Better than SMG trailers? I would argue differently. Anyway trailers prove shitall in the long run, its the game itself that matters.

2 - FF13, FF Versus, Last Remnant.  Wheres that bigger support?

The DQ games (IX and swords), the mana series (children and heroes?), Crystal Chronicles

3 - PS3 advanced hardware means long life.

See 3DO for answer to this one.

 I would not use that idiot gballzack as any example, 1200 posts and majority of them nothing but troll jobs.   That double standard agian, Ps3 hatin is alot more acceptable then wii hatin.

3rd party developer, guy that made Call of Duty3 called the Wii "GC 1.5" , and looking at basic hardwre numbers the Wii is no more powerfull then the original xbox.  Why cant some one say that if wii fanboys will post any dev saying PS3 is hard to develop for, or any blog complaining about the price.

Wii cpu 729, gpu 243,
GC cpu 485, gpu 162,
Xbox cpu , 733 gpu 233

 No its not the equivelant of saying the cheepest PS3 is $800.

If the Wii is so weak, weren't the PS2's graphics totally unacceptable to you and you all went out and bought Gamecubes? No? Didn't think so.

I want Nintendo to win because they're the best company for customer service, providing what the fans want, listening to a wider audience, providing innovations in hardware and software, and always managing to be profitable when others don't realise this.

You are actually saying the difference between PS2/GC graphics is no different then PS3/Wii.

Of course I'm not. If everyone is striving for the best graphics now, why didn't they last generation? According to the logic that PS3 should be more popular than Wii because of the graphics, so Gamecube should have been more popular than PS2 (it had better graphics and a lower price point).

I'm saying the situation is the same, not the actual figures.