I dont believe a lot of things, I dont believe in the bible, I dont believe the crap that many priests talk. I think religion is just a way to make society behave by the way its leaders want them to. I dont think we are the special ones in the planet. We might as well fade away in time and another species will think they are the chosen ones.
But I believe that there might be something that started us and some sort of energy that makes the universe the way it is, and maybe there is something after death. If there is awesome, if there is not, I wont care since I cant feel anything, that way Im not afraid of fading in time. But I think things happen in cycles so maybe there could be something after.
Im still 18, so I have a lot of time to think about my beliefs.

Agree, they just have a more limited brain. There is the same difference between a human a nd a dog that there is between a cat and a horse. My point is that we think we are some kind of chosen ones bu I dont think that way.

Big Bang Theory - Evidence for the Theory
What are the major evidences which support the Big Bang theory?

• First of all, we are reasonably certain that the universe had a beginning.
• Second, galaxies appear to be moving away from us at speeds proportional to their distance. This is called "Hubble's Law," named after Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) who discovered this phenomenon in 1929. This observation supports the expansion of the universe and suggests that the universe was once compacted.
• Third, if the universe was initially very, very hot as the Big Bang suggests, we should be able to find some remnant of this heat. In 1965, Radioastronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered a 2.725 degree Kelvin (-454.765 degree Fahrenheit, -270.425 degree Celsius) Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (CMB) which pervades the observable universe. This is thought to be the remnant which scientists were looking for. Penzias and Wilson shared in the 1978 Nobel Prize for Physics for their discovery.
• Finally, the abundance of the "light elements" Hydrogen and Helium found in the observable universe are thought to support the Big Bang model of origins.

• http://www.big-bang-theory.com/

The early hot, dense phase is itself referred to as "the Big Bang",^[21] and is considered the "birth" of our universe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_bang

There isn't enough evidence for the big bang, same as with the bible and any religion on the planet..

We do have enough evidence for evolution and just having completed my biology and genetics course I can tell you that 'the missing link' makes no sense if you've actually researched or learnt about the hominin fossils that have been found..

The problem is that scientists can't agree on the order due to more than one homo species existing at the same time in some cases..

With that aside I'd like you to answer me this..

The Homo genus evolved through speciation to have bigger brains, Homo sapiens have the largest frontal lobes which allows us to think logically, again medically proven, and only homo sapiens and homo neandathalians (spelling?) were actually the ones to bury their dead and cave paint and actually seek bonds with others of the opposite sex

What does a 'soul' have to do with your frontal lobes? Perhaps a soul is there and it gives us something but you can't say it gives us the will to marry etc

Certainly; an axiom must be used to be able to say anything.  To assert our observations and interpretations of "the universe" are, at least, generally reliable is no less an assumption then positing anything outside of the physical realm.

This is wrong.  The Big Bang theory states that knowledge of time and matter before the Big Bang and the physical laws that governed them are unknowable and have no direct influence on our universe and universal laws that exist now, not that nothing existed prior.

Just because many people may not be able to understand the intricies and complexities of a theory like the Big Bang doesn't make it untrue.  Layperson's logic told us for centuries that the world was flat despite the fact that there were mathematicians in about 450 B.C. that proved using relatively simple maths that the world was in fact round.  Yet the idea persisted in western countries for close to 2 millenia because most people couldn't 'see for themselves'.

I believe you are confusing flat-earth theory with the geocentrism/heliocentrism debate. Most Westerners believed in spherical earth. Many, however, doubted the idea of heliocentrism.

@ WessleWoggle

Of course you wouldn't be interested in it

They have recently proven exactly which chromosomes changed and combined and how.

I don't believe in God. I cannot commit to a theory that isn't tested and quantified. That however doesn't mean I don't find Christianity a fascinating subject and the concept alluring. It along with the Greeks and Romans did largely shape the western world after all.

There's too much science and philosophical discussion for me to wholly believe in anything. A truly intelligent person admits just how little they know of the universe. A theology that says it has all the answers isn't to be trusted.