By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - So let me get this straight, Microsoft is chocking sony to death

the xbox360 only has good value to compete with the ps3.
just wait till they get a monopoly or work sony out of the gaming bussiness, then you will see the real microsoft.

They did almost the exact same thing to Netscape, giving internet explorer away for free to complety dominate netscape(as well as various other dirty tactics) cuz they cannot make a superior product.


Now they sell the 360 for so cheap that sony can only compete by selling at a loss.

This is just 1 example, the tip of the iceberg so to speak.

Sure, now that the 360 is dirt cheap its forcing sony to lower its prices and pump out AAA Title on a monthly basis so its pretty sweet.

But once MS has a big enough marketshare we will be screwed, all of us.



Around the Network

"Sony got cocky and got the attitude that they were infallible, that their gaming division could do no wrong. They got into the mindset that the Playstation brand-name would always reign supreme, no matter the cost."

"They learned the hard way that brand name means a LOT less than they thought."

They didn't get cocky. They just got dumped by a lot of their fans that preferred a console that had one "great" game instead of Great games in all genres like the PS2. Well going on four years later, the 360 has managed to come up with two "great" games. So, if current trends continue, in the next gen Microsoft will have a console with three "great" games, but the video game market will truely be cheated out of all of the Great games in every genre that it used to have which were on Playstation consoles.



My most anticipated games:  Whatever Hideo Kojima is going to do next, Final Fantasy XIII, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Gran Turismo 5, Alan Wake, Wii Sports Resort.  Cave Story Wiiware.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqqLMgbtrB8

Paul_Warren said:
"Yeah, but since wii was released that strategy doesn't won't work anymore. Maybe on ps3 but wii is untouchable."

If Microsoft takes out Sony this gen, they will either take out or buy out Nintendo next gen.

That's the crap people need to stop posting. It's funny how these people assume any company wants to monopolize the industry when they aren't the company's executives. The execs make the decisions of whom to buy out. So to emphasize my point, how many people here think Paul_Warren is a Microsoft exec?



This thread is silly. Microsoft is a business — of course their goal is to make a profit. They are doing that by providing an attractive price-point with all the games that their userbase wants.

If you're going to be angry that they are beating Sony, you really should direct your ire towards Sony, themselves. They came into this generation with the momentum of 130 million consoles and blew it. They have no one to blame but themselves.



LEFT 4 DEAD - November 17th

Paul_Warren said:
"Yeah, but since wii was released that strategy doesn't won't work anymore. Maybe on ps3 but wii is untouchable."

If Microsoft takes out Sony this gen, they will either take out or buy out Nintendo next gen.

 

I can't see Microsoft simply taking out Nintendo given Nintendo's strong 1st party lineup. Microsoft aren't even competing in the handheld market which has kept Nintendo profitable for so long



Never argue with idiots
They bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience

Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
sega4life said:
leo-j said:

Well yes, thats exactly whats happening.

 

Microsoft is what is stopping sony from its "dominance" over the gaming market.

Whats going on? Well were to begin.

They have stolen every single game that was considered a playstation franchise developed by any 3rd party studio(yes stolen, Im so sure that SQUARE didnt decide to release STAR OCEAN 4 a massive RPG on the XBOX 360 exclusively all by themselves)

They have made sony gain a terrible image in the gaming industry

They have tricked consumers into thinking the XBOX 360 is the superior machine, because the original XBOX was better hardware wise

They created the catch phrase "Wii60"

They have dropped the price to MASS MARKET price, even though that might have but them in the red.

All I know is, Microsoft wants SONY out of the gaming industry, that has since been there goal since the original XBOX, and im sure they will offer 2-3billion dollars of losses for that to happen.

Buisness is buisness, and guess what, cheating is the perfect way to win.


Clicky the linky

Wall Street Journal Interview with Square Enix Quote: "We don't want the PlayStation 3 to be the overwhelming loser, so we want to support them. But we don't want them to be the overwhelming winner either, so we can't support them too much."

 

 

You do know Square was a Nintendo exclusive before Sony right?


I remember people making the $ame complaint about $ony and GTA3 when everyone on PC and Xbox wanted to play it, but I guess that was ok.

 

 

So basicly Square is saying they wanna be...fair? Alright kids lets have a review shall we?

  1. Final Fantasy XIII - PlayStation 3/ Xbox 360
  2. Star Ocean: The Last Hope - Xbox 360 ~Exclusive~
  3. Final Fantasy Versus XIII - PlayStation 3 ~World-Wide Exclusive~
  4. Final Fantasy Agito XIII -  PlayStation Portable ~Exclusive~
  5. Dissidia: Final Fantasy -  PlayStation Portable ~Exclusive~
  6. Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days -  Nintendo DS ~Exclusive~
  7. Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep -  PlayStation Portable ~Exclusive~
  8. Chaos Legion nIIn - PlayStation 3/ PlayStation Network  
  9. Infinite Undiscovery -  Xbox 360 ~Exclusive~
  10. Valkyrie Profile: Covenant of the Plume - Nintendo DS ~Exclusive~
  11. Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII - PlayStation Portable ~Exclusive~
  12. Dragon Gears - PlayStation Portable ~Exclusive~
  13. Blood of the Bahamut - Nintendo DS ~Exclusive~

 

Now, when you look at this "Recent/Upcoming games list" what pattern do you guys see here hmmm?

Yes, in the long run, Square has gone, "Mainly" Portable... Tsk, Tsk...

 

 

I agree, but wouldn't you say that they had to if they wanted to make profit friend?

To an extent i agree, but if there having "So Much Issues" Making games for the HD Consoles why not place some of the games that are going portable to the PlayStation 2 or PSN?

Truth be told, i think in my personal opinion, Square Enix isnt the epic gaming company we once new. they've changed alot since 2006.

 



wartaal said:
the xbox360 only has good value to compete with the ps3.
just wait till they get a monopoly or work sony out of the gaming bussiness, then you will see the real microsoft.

They did almost the exact same thing to Netscape, giving internet explorer away for free to complety dominate netscape(as well as various other dirty tactics) cuz they cannot make a superior product.


Now they sell the 360 for so cheap that sony can only compete by selling at a loss.

This is just 1 example, the tip of the iceberg so to speak.

Sure, now that the 360 is dirt cheap its forcing sony to lower its prices and pump out AAA Title on a monthly basis so its pretty sweet.

But once MS has a big enough marketshare we will be screwed, all of us.

I hope you realize how stupid that sounds.



wartaal said:
the xbox360 only has good value to compete with the ps3.
just wait till they get a monopoly or work sony out of the gaming bussiness, then you will see the real microsoft.

They did almost the exact same thing to Netscape, giving internet explorer away for free to complety dominate netscape(as well as various other dirty tactics) cuz they cannot make a superior product.


Now they sell the 360 for so cheap that sony can only compete by selling at a loss.

This is just 1 example, the tip of the iceberg so to speak.

Sure, now that the 360 is dirt cheap its forcing sony to lower its prices and pump out AAA Title on a monthly basis so its pretty sweet.

But once MS has a big enough marketshare we will be screwed, all of us.

 

Durrrrrrrrrr,didnt Sony did the same EXACT thing last gen??????

 

PS Fanfeinds arnt smart.



I still think Sony's mistake in terms of the GAMING market was Blu-Ray. Now overall for their business, that may yet pay off. (Maybe. But HD-streaming Netflix boxes, for example, are selling like hotcakes. I still think the Blu-Ray format won't an out before on demand systems take over - we'll see.)

But in terms of just gaming, they really have one game that really uses the Blu-Ray fully - MGS4. Or am I missing some? Yes, they might have to put a game or two on 2 discs, but stopping for a minute or two once or twice to swap discs midway through a 20+ hour game is really no different than installing ahead of time.

Because they waited a year to get Blu-Ray ready and they had trouble keeping up with Blu-Ray parts at the beginning, not to mention the added expense, they got behind early. And they haven't been able to dig out yet. PS3 is the best hardware there is, but at what cost? It seemed like a good idea at the time, but I think history will write that it was a failed gamble on their part.



Can't we all just get along and play our games in peace?

"(Maybe. But HD-streaming Netflix boxes, for example, are selling like hotcakes. I still think the Blu-Ray format won't an out before on demand systems take over - we'll see.)"

Do you know how long it takes to download an HD movie on 512 k internet connection?



My most anticipated games:  Whatever Hideo Kojima is going to do next, Final Fantasy XIII, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Gran Turismo 5, Alan Wake, Wii Sports Resort.  Cave Story Wiiware.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqqLMgbtrB8