By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Half Life 2 is the Best Shooter... Ever

Onyxmeth said:

I don't get it. You lumped every shooter, regardless of quality, features or innovations into one pile. Red Steel and Killzone in the same sentence as Halo and Call of Duty? Seriously?

Also you seem to be under the impression that every game that takes place in first person and features projectile weapons should be considered a shooter and all judged under the same criteria. Your three current best all have the same thing in common. They are all more adventures than they are shooters. Two of the three don't even feature a gun as the default weapon. I'm not under the mindset that the first person perspective is the exclusive domain of shooters, and other genres can be included while still featuring guns.

Your opinion seems to lie with you enjoying first person adventures more than you like first person shooters, which is fine. Half-Life 2 is the pinnacle of first person adventures. The fact that you put Bioshock on the good list while everyone else got put on the copy cat or bad list surprises me. If any game over the last four years was a complete knock-off of Half-Life 2 it's Bioshock.

Half-Life 2 is not the best shooter to me, but I haven't finished it either. The reason I say that is, what makes Half-Life 2 so great is the narrative, atmosphere, physics, etc. but I have played games that I have enjoyed the shooting portions of much more.

You're also putting it up against games you haven't played or aren't even out yet.

Bottom line is, Half-Life 2 is a superb game, but it has no business being in a comparison with something like Gears of War 2(or insert other shooting-focused shooter here) because they are just so different in their strengths and weaknesses.

 

Your right I do have no business comparing the 2 becuase they aren't on the same level.  Gears is too primitive to compare fairly. 

You see people love to give these stereotypical shooters a break by putting the great shooters in another category.  It was done with Metroid Prime and Bioshock and now it's being don with Half Life 2.  Save your self some trouble when arguing that with me becaue I don't buy into the bullshit.  If you want to give those games lead way by putting it on a scale that is less intense as HL2 then that's fine but your only proving my point more.



Around the Network

I personally enjoyed bioshock more



PS3, WII and 360 all great systems depends on what type of console player you are.

Currently playing Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, Fallout 3, Halo ODST and Dragon Age Origins is next game

Xbox live:mywiferocks

Cool, you've found the HL2. I agree with your points.

Now Play "Portal" also by Valve the creators of HL2. It's not a shooter. It's pretty short. But it's one of the best GAMES ever created - Why are not more games like this one?

Valve is unique.



Playing : PC  AOE, DiRT 2, Runes of Magic, Wings of Prey & Planetside 2  

Wii U : Nintendoland, Super Mario U  & Fifa 2013 demo

DS : Guitar Hero : On Tour


Formerly unknown as Vengi

http://vgchartz.com/profiles/profile.php?id=2331

Zucas is correct. If you disagree, you clearly are not a hardcore gamer.



http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">

Venji said:
Cool, you've found the HL2. I agree with your points.

Now Play "Portal" also by Valve the creators of HL2. It's not a shooter. It's pretty short. But it's one of the best GAMES ever created - Why are not more games like this one?

Valve is unique.

 

Yea it took me a long time considering I'm not much of a PC gamer but I knew there had to be more to shooters than just run and gun from level to level.  I mean I love those shooters jsut as much as the next guy but not really for single player and just online and I can only play so many of those at once... usually one or 2 haha.  So buying the Orange Box was a big move for me if I do say so myself because I'm finally able to experience one of those games that truly is Amazing.  I mean I don't throw out "legend of zelda of shooters" too many times haha.



Around the Network
Bodhesatva said:

Zucas is correct. If you disagree, you clearly are not a hardcore gamer.

 

Haha I wouldn't go that far.  A hardcore gamer, by my definition, is someone who plays video games a lot.  Really doesn't matter which game they play.

As I said this is purely opinion and the point of it was to give justice where it's due.  I mean HL2 has deserved it.  But I don't mind open discussion about my opinions or other's who may not agree.  If we aren't able to discuss it then what's the point of having an opinion.  Because then it just becomes an authority.



Zucas, all I can say is this: Half-Life 2 is the best shooter I have ever played.

It's all in the pacing. Lots of games either forget this or do not know how to do it. It's also a lot about the physics, it's the first game where you could truly interact with your enviroment, and it hasn't been trumphed in that department since. In my humble opinion.



This is invisible text!

Zucas said:
Onyxmeth said:

I don't get it. You lumped every shooter, regardless of quality, features or innovations into one pile. Red Steel and Killzone in the same sentence as Halo and Call of Duty? Seriously?

Also you seem to be under the impression that every game that takes place in first person and features projectile weapons should be considered a shooter and all judged under the same criteria. Your three current best all have the same thing in common. They are all more adventures than they are shooters. Two of the three don't even feature a gun as the default weapon. I'm not under the mindset that the first person perspective is the exclusive domain of shooters, and other genres can be included while still featuring guns.

Your opinion seems to lie with you enjoying first person adventures more than you like first person shooters, which is fine. Half-Life 2 is the pinnacle of first person adventures. The fact that you put Bioshock on the good list while everyone else got put on the copy cat or bad list surprises me. If any game over the last four years was a complete knock-off of Half-Life 2 it's Bioshock.

Half-Life 2 is not the best shooter to me, but I haven't finished it either. The reason I say that is, what makes Half-Life 2 so great is the narrative, atmosphere, physics, etc. but I have played games that I have enjoyed the shooting portions of much more.

You're also putting it up against games you haven't played or aren't even out yet.

Bottom line is, Half-Life 2 is a superb game, but it has no business being in a comparison with something like Gears of War 2(or insert other shooting-focused shooter here) because they are just so different in their strengths and weaknesses.

 

Your right I do have no business comparing the 2 becuase they aren't on the same level.  Gears is too primitive to compare fairly. 

You see people love to give these stereotypical shooters a break by putting the great shooters in another category.  It was done with Metroid Prime and Bioshock and now it's being don with Half Life 2.  Save your self some trouble when arguing that with me becaue I don't buy into the bullshit.  If you want to give those games lead way by putting it on a scale that is less intense as HL2 then that's fine but your only proving my point more.

Proving what point? Your definition of shooter is vague and seems to encompass anything with a first person perspective and guns, other than you throwing in Gears for good measure. What about Resident Evil 4? It's a pretty steriotypical shooter right? Dementium? Condemned? Grand Theft Auto?

I don't remember Metroid being called a shooter back when it was 2D. Metroidvania games from Konami all get labeled adventure. Now suddenly Metroid goes into first person and its genre switching? If Metroid Prime isn't an adventure game then describe to me what an adventure game would have to do in the first person perspective to still be considered an adventure? Not have guns?

They don't call Fallout 3 and Mass Effect shooters, and I'm pretty sure what you do most of the game is shooting.

Just because a game features guns does not make it a shooter. Compare games that are similiar. Halo, Gears of War, Call of Duty, Resistance, etc. are not trying to be Half-Life 2. They are carving out their own space, but you would rather give the credit to a complete HL2 knockoff like Bioshock.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



I actually think the original Half:Life and Half:Life Opposing Force are even better.

When Half:Life was released, it revolutionised the FPS genre. Half:Life 2 -while also a fantastic game- simply didn't hold the same 'wow' factor for me as the first did at launch.

I guess I was expecting Valve to somehow reach even greater heights with the sequel, and was ever so slightly let down when the second game didn't really manage to exceed the first, only match it, ergo reaching a standard that was already set, years past.

Although the gravity gun needs an honourable mention as being revolutionary. It's one of the greatest FPS weapons ever.



 

According to his avatar, Zucas should know what I mean when I say that Resident Evil 4 is Half Life 2's if the game was a third person shooter. The reason I say that is almost every fight in RE4 is different than the one before it. The game is great about keeping you on your toes, and Half Life 2 was the same way. These games sets the standard for keeping shooting games interesting.

BTW: In my opinion, Resident Evil 4 is more action/shooter than horror game. It just isn't as scary as the first 3 and zero. That is not a bad thing, however, as it excels at what it does. That is why I compare it too Half Life 2 (plus, HL2 had zombie like enemies also).