Man, it must be terrible for juiceingamer to be damage controlling Sony in more than one thread! What has the world come to?! o_0
The BuShA owns all!
Man, it must be terrible for juiceingamer to be damage controlling Sony in more than one thread! What has the world come to?! o_0
The BuShA owns all!
They should do like Rockstar and Infinity Ward and develop each game on each platform independently. That resulted in almost perfect versions of each game (GTA and COD) on both platform. On the one hand, you got perfect framerate and more details for the 360 because of its 512MB available ram, while PS3 was optimized using its more advanced processing power.
Leading on one platform and porting on the other is horrible. Starting with 360, PS3 will have ugly graphics and framerate problem because you go from 512MB to 256MB for graphics, and starting on PS3 and then porting to 360, you won't maximize the 360's capability. On the other hand, they won't fully concentrate on the PS3 either because of the 7SPE it has while 360 has less. Stuffs like this. In the end, the best thing is to develop and optimize each console separately
| reptile168 said: They should do like Rockstar and Infinity Ward and develop each game on each platform independently. That resulted in almost perfect versions of each game (GTA and COD) on both platform. On the one hand, you got perfect framerate and more details for the 360 because of its 512MB available ram, while PS3 was optimized using its more advanced processing power. Leading on one platform and porting on the other is horrible. Starting with 360, PS3 will have ugly graphics and framerate problem because you go from 512MB to 256MB for graphics, and starting on PS3 and then porting to 360, you won't maximize the 360's capability. On the other hand, they won't fully concentrate on the PS3 either because of the 7SPE it has while 360 has less. Stuffs like this. In the end, the best thing is to develop and optimize each console separately |
Good point,but were taling about EA,and all they care about is money,they can have crappy games for all they care.
Harsh words there garnett, crappy games from EA? i think you need to check your facts, BF bad company?, burnout? Madden? NHL? Dead space? I dont think those games fit in the trash bag
| thejuicingamer said: Harsh words there garnett, crappy games from EA? i think you need to check your facts, BF bad company?, burnout? Madden? NHL? Dead space? I dont think those games fit in the trash bag |
BF Bad Company something iv seen before,prehaps Battlefield 2? Burnout is racing,NFL and NHL = millions of them and Dead space is a rare gem...
All good games never the less. nobodys forcing you to buy them :)
| thejuicingamer said: All good games never the less. nobodys forcing you to buy them :) |
Only one of them is good,Infact coming from a PC gamer i know that BF Bad Company is just BF2 with cheap destructable enviorments,i played project reality and they basically made BF BD before BF BD was even announced..
But yea no one is forcing me to buy them.
Garnett said:
Only one of them is good,Infact coming from a PC gamer i know that BF Bad Company is just BF2 with cheap destructable enviorments,i played project reality and they basically made BF BD before BF BD was even announced.. But yea no one is forcing me to buy them. |
So, "Burnout is racing" is the basis for your argument that the game is no good? I hardly ever enjoy racing games, but I love Burnout.
|
Hates Nomura. Tagged: GooseGaws - <--- Has better taste in games than you. |
| thejuicingamer said: Anyways sticking to the main point, PS3 versions will now be the best. |
*sigh* Grow up.
Zenfolder explained it quite well, I also thought coming in this thread that they are going with PS3 to support it fully and get more profit on the PS3. But since PS3 is hard to port into, it will be easier to port out from.
This is good for PS3 and gamers of EA games but I bet MS would want sony to get a bad ported game.