By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Well, the election is tomorrow.

Jackson50 said:
PATRIOT7ME said:
Jackson50 said:
PATRIOT7ME said:
Jackson50 said:
Experience is an overrated attribute. If we are voting based solely on experience, then I am voting for Robert Byrd.

another liberal lie. If you think being a president so damn easy. Why don't you run? Maybe you learn something through that bonehead of yours. ALso you can do some studing on Jimmy Carter. Find out why experience matters.

 

I am under the age of thirty five, so I am constitutionally prohibited from being elected president. Anyways, experience is not an important attribute. Some of our more capable presidents had "little experience." Grover Cleveland had only two years experience as a governor and he was a more than capable president. Lincoln's experience consisted of one term in the House before he was elected president, and he is considered-I should note, I do not consider him this-one of the greatest president in our nation's history. I think it is you, my misinformed friend, who needs to be educated 

 

if you were smart you would know that a governor can be much more experienced than a Senator. Obama doesn't have any capable to handle today's issues. JImmy Carter is a pure fact why you shouldn't vote for an inexperienced person.

 

I find it ironic that Carter was a governor and that McCain was not. Anyways, even though I disagree with that sentiment, how do you explain Lincoln's success considering his lack of experience? He was neither a senator nor a governor, and many consider him to be an exceptional president. McCain's experience would not make him a better president. In fact, I am glad he has as much experience as he does. We now know that he would be an unmitigated disaster.

Mccain never wanted to be a governor that's why. Things were much different in  Licnoln's time. Recent presidents matters more than for today's issues than. I find it funny you find you can say Mccain is a disaster but you refuse to say obama is with his tax plans.

 



Around the Network

Im going for Obama.

And experience matters, but more experience doesn't necessarily mean better.

Who has experience being a President? Not McCain or Obama. But I believe Obama has great character and truly puts middle America first. He's just a better leader all around.

You guys wanna see something I thought was funny?

http://www.gulbransen.net/images/blog/2004ElectionIQ.png

Kinda telling, isn't it? (24 and up are now most likely going to vote democratic)



Just so you know Patriot, you are being way out of line in this thread, as you have been in many others. If I see another disrespectful and insulting post from you in the political threads, I'm banning you for 3 days.

I don't care if you want Satan to win the election, just be respectful about it.



I'm a mod, come to me if there's mod'n to do. 

Chrizum is the best thing to happen to the internet, Period.

Serves me right for challenging his sales predictions!

Bet with dsisister44: Red Steel 2 will sell 1 million within it's first 365 days of sales.

cdude1034 said:
PATRIOT7ME said:
cdude1034 said:
ManusJustus said:
PATRIOT7ME said: 

1. records of experience idiot. mCcain wins with ease. Former Hilary voters agreee that Obama lacks experience.

2.  Better than obama. Palin more experienced than obama.

3.please. Obama is gonna raise your taxes fool. He is gonna raise taxes  on small business and that will hurt jobs. Besides can't help us with a crisis if he's not experienced enough for it.

Please go on.  I was going to vote for Obama, but after this very insightful post I may just vote for McCain.

I would also like to congratulate cdude on his $250,000+ salary.  Very nice!

 

You know, I was strongly considering reporting Patriot, but after reading his well thought out, insightful posts, I think I'll let him live for a little while longer

Experience as what? President? McCain lacks that too, and that's the only experience that matters. We don't need war vet experience, we have hundreds of thousands of Americans who have that, as well as some very capable generals actually leading our war.

Patriot obviously is the smartest guy here. The fact that he calls us names like "idiot" and "fool" only reinforce his already rock-solid arguments as to why McCain is the better choice. If only every one of his supporters were as verbose and elegant...oh wait...

1.You'll only report me because I'm mccain dude. You wouldn't care if it's a Obama dude.

 

2. Don;;t play dumb games with me. National defense experience always matters for a president.

3. You liberals have the name hate on you. Calling everyone a redneck, stupid, racist,etc for voting mccain. Don't tell me I can't critize you when you critize me.

 

I guess I'm only feeding the trolls, but here I go:

1) No, I'd report you for adding nothing to the thread while calling everyone who disagrees with you names. You call us idiots, fools, and you throw out the label "liberal". Not that being one is bad, but you certainly don't mean it in a good way.

2) Where's McCain's national defense experience? Has he ever led in a war? Has he ever had high level security talks? Strategized about a war? He's good at following directions, that's for sure, but I still haven't seen any leadership experience from him in this particular area. And, btw, no, it doesn't always matter. For Clinton it would have been pretty moot.

3) I'm actually pretty moderate. I just hate Palin, that's all. No one here called anyone a redneck, stupid, or racist. You can criticize me all you want, I'd just rather it be on a factual basis.

 

1. yeah trust me you would not care if it's an obama dude calling someone names.

 

2.McCain has pushed Bush to send more troops to  Iraq. So far the plan has been working and we are winning there. Also McCain was in a war and served for the navy. ObaMa hasn't really been in a war and doesn't fully understand what it is like.

 

3. What's a matter with palin she's a good icon for women.

 



I love how conservatives say we can skip McCain's character, skip his lack of plan for the economy, skip his completely moronic choice in a VP (really did cost him the election) and just concentrate on his experience (not what he actually did, but how long he did it).

Please. If he had done something monumental while in Congress I could agree, but the truth is his most recent actions in the Senate allude to a Bush sequel. More taxes, more wars, more stubborn foreign policy.



Around the Network

Bob Barr for me.

Obama and MC Cain are in my eyes not good candidates.






Jandre002 said:
I love how conservatives say we can skip McCain's character, skip his lack of plan for the economy, skip his completely moronic choice in a VP (really did cost him the election) and just concentrate on his experience (not what he actually did, but how long he did it).

Please. If he had done something monumental while in Congress I could agree, but the truth is his most recent actions in the Senate allude to a Bush sequel. More taxes, more wars, more stubborn foreign policy.

 

Has Obama done anything monumental? No. All he does is raise taxes.



PATRIOT7ME said:Mccain never wanted to be a governor that's why. Things were much different in  Licnoln's time. Recent presidents matters more than for today's issues than. I find it funny you find you can say Mccain is a disaster but you refuse to say obama is with his tax plans.

I do not support Obama, my ignorant friend. I also have never refused to criticize him. I simply stated that experience is an overrated attribute. I have highlighted a few examples of exceptional presidents who had less experience than Obama. I think that is enough evidence to support my assertion that experience is an overrated attribute. 

 



konnichiwa said:
Bob Barr for me.

Obama and MC Cain are in my eyes not good candidates.

 

If you studied both you would understand who to vote for. Voting for someone who's gonna lose is a worthless vote.



Palin isn't the best of icons for women. There's plenty better to look up to than her.