Why on earth are we using youtube videos to compare?

Nutters?

You know this isn't a SFW title right?

Youtube videos are definitely not the way to compare graphics.

gears of war 2 luks beter than greyzone 2

LOL wow, comparing graphics on youtube videos, what has the world come to. Anyways, KZ2 (based on that video) looks better, and its ridiculous cuz it still has like 3 months left. It's not to say that it will look significantly better (or even a little bit better) but it could happen. Personally I just hope they take those 3 months to lock down the FPS and make the AI and gameplay better (than it already is)

-I think you made this thread so you can seem 'unbiased' by mentioning the graphics of KZ2 (which, if u didn't mention, would be biased) yet add a little bit of bias by saying that Gears 2 looks better 'imo'. I find sneaky tactics quite funny.

frankly, i'll get killed by the xbots for this, but geow 2 reminds of a ps2 game.

Guys, Havent u heard all the sites etc saying that KZ2 beats everything, even Heavy Rain

BTW, Never use Youtube to compare. You will see a far different story on a 1080p TV

Actually the video he used was from May.  So it is more like 10 months.

I think it can be put roughly into the two categories:

Gears2: Characters look more detailled up close, some really really awesome lighting.

Killzone2: Much more small details going all the way into the screen. (Gears2 has also buildings in the background but it always looks a bit faked, in K2 you see small details as far as the resolution will allow), better particle effects like smoke, much more things going on, far better character animations.

Gears2 looks like a render movie with a focus on characters and enemies (the predator style enemy looks amazing). Killzone2 succeeds in all videos in creating a war-scene with explosions, smoke, enemies all over the map.

Both are technically amazing and both have their strengths but I think which is better is depending on your taste.