By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Bush's final plan to gaurantee his place in history.

Bush team makes final push for deregulation

http://www.star-telegram.com/238/story/1009743.html

The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — The White House is working to enact a wide array of federal regulations, many of which would weaken government rules aimed at protecting consumers and the environment, before President Bush leaves office in January.

The new rules would be among the most controversial deregulatory steps of the Bush era and could be difficult for his successor to undo. Some would ease or lift existing constraints on private industry, including power plants, mines and farms.

Those and other regulations would help clear obstacles to some commercial ocean-fishing activities, ease controls on emissions of pollutants that contribute to global warming, relax drinking-water standards and lift a key restriction on mountaintop coal mining.

Once such rules take effect, they typically can be undone only through a laborious new regulatory proceeding, including lengthy periods of public comment, drafting and mandated reanalysis. White House spokesman Tony Fratto said the regulations are "well-reasoned and are being considered with the best interests of the nation in mind."

As many as 90 new regulations are in the works, and at least nine of them are considered "economically significant" because they impose costs or promote societal benefits that exceed $100 million annually. They include new rules governing employees who take family and medical-related leaves, new standards for preventing or containing oil spills, and a simplified process for settling real estate transactions.

In some cases, the regulations reflect new interpretations of language in federal laws. In other cases, such as several new counterterror initiatives, they reflect new executive branch decisions in areas where Congress — now out of session and focused on the elections — left the president considerable discretion.

The burst of last-minute activity has made this a busy period for lobbyists who fear that industry views will hold less sway after the November elections. The doors at the New Executive Office Building annex have been whirling with corporate officials and advisers pleading for relief or, in many cases, for hastened decision making.

According to the Office of Management and Budget’s regulatory calendar, the commercial scallop fishing industry came in two weeks ago to urge that proposed catch limits be eased, nearly bumping into National Mining Association officials making the case for easing rules meant to keep coal slurry waste out of Appalachian streams. A few days earlier, lawyers for kidney dialysis and biotechnology companies registered their complaints at the OMB about new Medicare reimbursement rules. Lobbyists for customs brokers complained about proposed counterterror rules that require the advance reporting of shipping data.

Bush’s aides are acutely aware of the political risks of completing their regulatory work too late. On the afternoon of Bush’s inauguration, Jan. 20, 2001, his chief of staff issued a memo that blocked the completion or implementation of regulations drafted in the waning days of the Clinton administration that had not yet taken effect.

Clinton’s appointees wound up paying a heavy price for procrastination. Bush’s team was able to withdraw 254 regulations that covered matters such as drug and airline safety, immigration and indoor air pollutants. After further review, many of the proposals were modified to reflect Republican policy ideals or scrapped altogether.

Seeking to avoid falling victim to the same partisan tactics, White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten last May imposed a Nov. 1 governmentwide deadline to finish major new Bush administration regulations, "except in extraordinary circumstances."

Many of the rules that could be issued over the next few weeks would ease environmental regulations

He's definitely going to be remembered.


I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

Around the Network

Explain to be how this would be Bush's fault, and not Congress? (who our next president is part of)



Because a president put these regulations into affect as executive orders, so the president can undo them. The congress, years ago,gave the ability to regulate specific practices to the experts in the departments under the supervision of the president.



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

So instead of actually talking specifically about what is being done, the article is spreading FUD. Awesome.



These moves would clearly be unpopular, so now is the best time to do it if you're the Bush administration. And I say the less the government regulates our lives, the better.



Around the Network

Glad to see Bush cares more about corporations saving a few $$$ than the quality of our lives and the quality of the world we live in.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Broncos724 said:
These moves would clearly be unpopular, so now is the best time to do it if you're the Bush administration. And I say the less the government regulates our lives, the better.

 

This is the confusion people often have.  This isn't government regulating your life.  This is government regulating things that effect your life that you wouldn't have any control over.  Like Bush has already done to the inspection of food, regulation of the sale of drugs, the testing of contaminants and poisons in products like toys, banking supervision, the security of our airports and seaports, and now he wants to extend that to everything else.

Saying " the less the government regulates our lives, the better", when we are talking about government regulation for health, safety, or security of finances demonstrates a lack of understanding. 

Regulating the manufacture, shipment, and sale of items or products that we can not control as individual citizens is not a bad thing.  It's actually understood in capitalism, that to have a free market you need to have equal information.  The government has the duty to make sure these things are safe because if they are not you'll find out after you're already sick or dead.

Of course all the genius amateur-free market-economists on the internet would not know that, because they've never tried to actually learn about it.

BTW, on an aside:

When does a republican stay out of your life?  Guns and...  guns and...

If they had had their way over the past 50 years, blacks still would barely be able to vote, discrimination for race, gender, age, and disability would still be a-OK, your boss would still be able to sexually harass you, and injustice would be even more rampant than it is today.  If you're gay, they don't want you to have rights.  If your young or black, they don't want you to vote.  If your skin is brown, they don't want you to immigrate.  If you don't believe in their god, they want to kick you out of school.  If you get injured while doing something heroic, they send you a medical bill.  They tap your phone and arrest you with out due process, in the name of the public good.



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

Yeah, fuck regulation!

Lets pump more lead into our air so that our children get brain damage more often! Lets allow anything at all to be put into our drinking water! Lets allow fisherman to fish to the point that they destroy entire ecosystems so that we can't even eat certain types of fish anymore! Lets get rid of the FDA so anything whatsoever can be sold in stores, even if it causes severe birth defects or will give you cancer!

Regulation is what holds this country back. God Bless America!



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

steven787 said:
Broncos724 said:
These moves would clearly be unpopular, so now is the best time to do it if you're the Bush administration. And I say the less the government regulates our lives, the better.

 

This is the confusion people often have.  This isn't government regulating your life.  This is government regulating things that effect your life that you wouldn't have any control over.  Like Bush has already done to the inspection of food, regulation of the sale of drugs, the testing of contaminants and poisons in products like toys, banking supervision, the security of our airports and seaports, and now he wants to extend that to everything else.

Saying " the less the government regulates our lives, the better", when we are talking about government regulation for health, safety, or security of finances demonstrates a lack of understanding. 

Regulating the manufacture, shipment, and sale of items or products that we can not control as individual citizens is not a bad thing.  It's actually understood in capitalism, that to have a free market you need to have equal information.  The government has the duty to make sure these things are safe because if they are not you'll find out after you're already sick or dead.

Of course all the genius amateur-free market-economists on the internet would not know that, because they've never tried to actually learn about it.

BTW, on an aside:

When does a republican stay out of your life?  Guns and...  guns and...

If they had had their way over the past 50 years, blacks still would barely be able to vote, discrimination for race, gender, age, and disability would still be a-OK, your boss would still be able to sexually harass you, and injustice would be even more rampant than it is today.  If you're gay, they don't want you to have rights.  If your young or black, they don't want you to vote.  If your skin is brown, they don't want you to immigrate.  If you don't believe in their god, they want to kick you out of school.  If you get injured while doing something heroic, they send you a medical bill.  They tap your phone and arrest you with out due process, in the name of the public good.

No, the Republicans would never enact regulations or keep regulations in place that hurt people...that's just a lie! 

Women have breasts an ass for one reason, to please me.  Why should we allow them to sue for sexual harassment.  It used to be you could pressure any woman in the work place into sex or threaten that she would lose her job.  Those were the good ol' days...

 



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

akuma587 said:

Women have breasts an ass for one reason, to please me.  Why should we allow them to sue for sexual harassment.  It used to be you could pressure any woman in the work place into sex or threaten that she would lose her job.  Those were the good ol' days...

Those "good ol' days" are still alive in Russia.

In fact, they're so much alive that Russian women have to attach notes when applying for jobs stating "intim nye predlagat" indicating that they will not sleep with their bosses/hirers.  Of course, that means they're automatically put on the bottom pile of people to hire as well.

Ignorance must be bliss for you.