By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - George Harrison: Wii Hardware Revision 'Not Out of the Question'

So what? They never had them on the GC either. So they're not "losing" anything.



Around the Network

What would be really bitchin is a USB attachment thats basically an external video card to piggyback onto whats in the Wii already. It would have more RAM, and an extra/better GPU to enable those oh so coveting HD resolutions and shader effects. All games would still support Wii without the attachment, but the new games would have optional eye candy and higher resolutions that would kick on automagically if you have the attachment.

Not sure if USB is fast enough to be a passthrough though. I thought they had external video cards already that ran on USB.



Witty signature here...

Wii: 14 million by January  I sold myself short

360: 13 million by January I sold microsoft short, but not as bad as Nintendo.

PS3: 6 million by January. If it approaches 8 mil i'll eat crow  Mnn Crow is yummy.

With these results, I've determined that I suck at long term predictions, and will not long term predict anything ever again. Thus spaketh Crono.

Nonquihote said:

 pirists/hardcore/core they are losing them, and they know it the guy said it himself.

  I can say dragons exists and iam a frodo the elf, but facts are the biggest franchises are not on the wii and it does not seem like they will be any time soon. 

 What will happen at 300 is PS3 will tap in to the tens of millions of formar PS owners.  PS2 is still selling great and creating more PS fans that will be uprading to a new console a few years from now, put the two together.

 


What portion of the PS2's userbase are purests, hard-core or core gamers? Consider for a moment that NO PS2 game ever sold to more that 20% of PS2 owners ...

Even if these purest, hard-core and core gamers eventually buy a PS3 what is stopping them from buying a Wii? Consider that 90% to 95% of current Wii owners would fall into the purest, hard-core and core gamers categories ...

In my opinion, one of the main reasons the Wii is selling so well is because of Generation X. Born between 1965 and 1980, Generation X was the first generation of people who were gamers; the older members of the generation grew up with pinball and pong while the younger ones tend to have more memories of Mario on the NES. Up until now this generation has determined the outcome of every previous generation and as they moved into their teens and early adult years their desire for more 'Mature' gaming lead to the dominance of Sony ...

Today the yongest of this generation is in their late 20s while the oldest are in their early 40s, most of them have started families and are looking to share videogames with their children. Graphics are (for the most part) a lesser consern for them because they still remember playing Zelda or Metal Gear on the NES and the capabilities of the Playstation 2 to produce high quality graphics are 'good enough' for a large portion of them.

Nintendo has produced a system that they can play in their limited spare time, enjoy with their Wife (who normally doesn't play games) and their children (including their daughters who don't normally play videogames). The PS3 and XBox 360 have NOTHING which can compete with that.



Nintendo is definitely gaining lots of ground this generation. The last two generations, they were trying to pander more towards the, "hard core" gaming population wiht very little support from anyone (devs and public). I am impressed at how well they have turned the market. I am not sure they are losing any more gamers than they were already losing from the start. By extension, I am not sure if they will ever gain those customers back. I do know for certain that Nintendo made a wise decision and if they continue on this path, we will be looking at a very different console generation next time around.



01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000

Crono said:
What would be really bitchin is a USB attachment thats basically an external video card to piggyback onto whats in the Wii already. It would have more RAM, and an extra/better GPU to enable those oh so coveting HD resolutions and shader effects. All games would still support Wii without the attachment, but the new games would have optional eye candy and higher resolutions that would kick on automagically if you have the attachment.

Not sure if USB is fast enough to be a passthrough though. I thought they had external video cards already that ran on USB.

 It isn't.  Throughput on PCIe x16 is 4 GB/s; throughput on USB 2.0 is 480 MB/s.  I'm not sure exactly what the Wii uses to communicate with its GPU but you're pretty much guaranteed that a USB solution would be a downgrade.



Around the Network
Nonquihote said:
redspear said:
Nonquihote said:
New tech in the wii or just wii slim ? They are losing gamers now, what will happen when theres a 400 or 300 dollar PS3.

You are going to need to clarify this potentially vague statement. They are not losing gamers and if they are what does this have to say about the 360 and PS3 because they are not selling anywhere near as well. I think you meant to say that they are losing hardcore gamers which is possible and something that was even mentioned in the interview but the install base is growing and it will outsell the GC total LTD sales by the end of next year maybe even as early as June 2008. So there is no way it is losing gamers but only a small fragmetn who will come back agfter teh install base peaks over 50 million and the biggest franchises will be on the Wii.

 

What will happen when the PS3 sells for 300? Not that much really the 400 dollar market is being dried up by the 360 at the moment. The PS3 has mostly dried up the 600 dollar market. By hte time the PS3 gets to 300 the 360 will have dried that one up as well and the 360 will be toying with the 200 dollar impulse buy market while the Wii will be messing with the value level market of sub 150. Blu Ray won't make a difference as by the time the PS3 is 300 Blu ray players should be sub 100 dollar range if they have had any type of market penetration if not than consumers will not care about it as much.

 

Sure the PS3 will see sales spikes with price cuts but they won't be long lived until it gets under 300 and that will only matter if the average gamer hasn't got tired of waiting and moved on already. Not that the PS3 is doomed but the price at this point will always be a hinderance to its success.


 pirists/hardcore/core they are losing them, and they know it the guy said it himself.

  I can say dragons exists and iam a frodo the elf, but facts are the biggest franchises are not on the wii and it does not seem like they will be any time soon. 

 What will happen at 300 is PS3 will tap in to the tens of millions of formar PS owners.  PS2 is still selling great and creating more PS fans that will be uprading to a new console a few years from now, put the two together.

 


If anyone's tapping the PS2 user base, it's Nintendo. The PS2 was built on the mainstream audience, not core gamers. Core gamers bought the system, but there probably aren't 40 million of them, let alone 120 million.



RPGuy96 said:
Crono said:
What would be really bitchin is a USB attachment thats basically an external video card to piggyback onto whats in the Wii already. It would have more RAM, and an extra/better GPU to enable those oh so coveting HD resolutions and shader effects. All games would still support Wii without the attachment, but the new games would have optional eye candy and higher resolutions that would kick on automagically if you have the attachment.

Not sure if USB is fast enough to be a passthrough though. I thought they had external video cards already that ran on USB.

It isn't. Throughput on PCIe x16 is 4 GB/s; throughput on USB 2.0 is 480 MB/s. I'm not sure exactly what the Wii uses to communicate with its GPU but you're pretty much guaranteed that a USB solution would be a downgrade.


QFT, even if it is an understatement lol.  There is pretty much no way you could get decent graphics over USB, especially since those 480 MB/s numbers are all burst speeds, not sustained.  Hell even Firewire 800 which is significantly faster (and significantly less supported) would be a huge stretch to do anything meaningful.

 

Don't get me wrong it's a good thought, but not feasible with the current setup. 



To Each Man, Responsibility

a wii slim wtf people. It is small enough. This isnt sony shrinking the same thing by a very little amount. When they change stuff they really do.


The only possibilty I see is HD and not because they want to put it in but developers will want to use it and keep asking for it if they havent already.



Cobretti said:
a wii slim wtf people. It is small enough. This isnt sony shrinking the same thing by a very little amount. When they change stuff they really do.


The only possibilty I see is HD and not because they want to put it in but developers will want to use it and keep asking for it if they havent already.

I could see Nintendo forgoing a 2008 price drop in favor of a WiiHD, or something similar. By then manufacturing costs should have dropped to the point where they can still turn a profit.  



If Nintendo's going to upgrade the system, it's going to be cost-effective, the last thing they will want to do is raise the price of the Wii.

The only things that really seem like they'd be effective improvements are:

DVD support
USB Mouse and Keyboard support (primarily for Internet Channel)
Wired internet connection (for people without the USB Wireless Connector)



PS3: 5.51m/51w, avg 108,039/w (up 239)
360: 12.93m/102w, avg 126,764/w (up 625), leads PS3 by 7.42m (up 70k), avg lead 18,725/w (up 386)
Wii: 13.52m/51w, avg 265,098/w (dn 1,102), leads PS3 by 8.01m (up 90k), avg lead 157,059/w (dn 1,341)

If 360 sales stabilize, PS3 sales increases needed to pass 360 by...
01/08: (008w) +875.8%, 04/08: (021w) +344.4%, 07/08: (034w) +219.3%, 10/08: (047w) +163.5%
01/09: (060w) +131.8%, 04/09: (073w) +111.4%, 07/09: (085w) +098.1%, 10/09: (099w) +086.7%
If Wii sales stabilize, PS3 sales increases needed to pass Wii by...
01/08: (008w) +1072.%, 04/08: (021w) +498.4%, 07/08: (034w) +363.4%, 10/08: (047w) +303.1%
01/09: (060w) +269.0%, 04/09: (073w) +246.9%, 07/09: (085w) +232.6%, 10/09: (099w) +220.3%
If PS2 sales freeze, Wii sales increases needed to pass PS2 (as of Mar07, 108.4m) by...
2008: (008w) +4373.8%, 2009: (060w) +0496.5%, 2010: (112w) +0219.6%, 2011: (165w) +0116.9%
2012: (217w) +0064.9%, 2013: (269w) +0033.1%, 2014: (321w) +0011.5%, 2015: (376w) -0004.8%
At +0% it will pass it in 358w, the week ending September 19th, 2014, at an age of 409w (7y44w).
Current age of PS2: 7y37w.

Last update: Week ending November 3, 2007