It wasn't really a spoiler, just replace location and the main bad guy, and you have roughly the same ending as the first game. At least gameplay should rule, nobody plays gears for narrative.
Kind of hard to make a judgment on a games' ending without knowing the 500 things that happen in between.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
mrstickball said: Kind of hard to make a judgment on a games' ending without knowing the 500 things that happen in between. |
This. Also the water effect was off.. by a lot.
Pixel Art can be fun.
The narrator sounds like the one for the LOTR trilogy.
This will only take a moment of your time. *steals your watch*
i hope that wasn't the actual ending , for the sake of everyone who bought it.
I'll avoid this thread like plague until after launch.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
Actually the ending was good. And as said before. The 500 story arcs through the rest of the game makes the ending.
@SmokedHostage.
Those are the best water effects Ive seen from an in game engine.
The cutscene was in engine. There is no CGI in Gears. That hole that appeared in the road was pure awesomeness.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.