Move to strike the evidence for lack of relevance.

The initial claim was "let's face it, we're (guys) just more suited to killing s***."

The fact that the female is from the cinema is irrelevant; nowhere did the declarant ever limit his statement to exclude the cinema.

Furthermore, the counterpoint was made to counter the absolute statement "we're just more suited..." A single counterpoint is sufficient for this purpose. Establishing a pair of males who are also suited for the same purpose is irrelevant to this discussion; all that matters is refuting or supporting the statement in question, and the objected-to statement did nothing of the sort.

The objection is sustained, and the evidence is stricken.

This topic is about gender... So if he owns all, does he really win? In order to win, would you have to have the most confusion regarding status of manhood?

+1 as well.

@sepharic: I don't get alot of your posts, you post a thread about genders, then when you get a response (i.e Pretendo's) you post a overused picture from the internet.

Then you say something like "it's most likely a guy anyway" for Halo 3 Recon. WRONG. I'm pretty sure there were females fighting in the Universe Halo is set in as well, and there are female spartans (i'm pretty sure one of the novels covers a female spartan).

You do realise that Samus was also "most likely a guy anyway" until the end of the first metroid, so don't go making assumptions, when clearly your point no longer stands and you were just grasping at straws.