Whoever publishes it, I hope it does well on the Wii whether it ends up being a 3rd party, 1st party or the sequel to Raving Rabbits party game.
And what's with Cammie? We need more Reggie.
I'll come up with something better eventually...
Whoever publishes it, I hope it does well on the Wii whether it ends up being a 3rd party, 1st party or the sequel to Raving Rabbits party game.
And what's with Cammie? We need more Reggie.
I'll come up with something better eventually...
crud, but, if nintendo published it, fcs would return.
DO NOT READ THIS TEXT.
| CAL4M1TY said: if this turns out to be true, it is actually a bad thing. If you think about it, Nintendo already have a hard enough time shaking off the stereotype that there is no core 3rd party support for the Wii. Conduit (along with Madworld) is on the top of nearly all core Wii owners buy lists, it was a beacon of hope for Wii gamers that the tide was turning 3rd party wise. Anyway, my guess is still Ubisoft to publish. |
I don't see how anyone outside VGChartz would really care...
- The game is the same, no difference there.
- It is likely to be published better, meaning that more non-gamers will get it. Just having the fact that it is a Nintendo published title would help more of them get it.
- Anyone who doesn't care about sales doesn't care whether 3rd party or 1st party sells more. For developers, 1 title won't really change anything.
http://www.vgchartz.com/games/userreviewdisp.php?id=261
That is VGChartz LONGEST review. And it's NOT Cute Kitten DS
It is already a fact that sega is the publisher of "The Conduit". So no more talk about Nintendo here 
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.