So if videogame reviewers only review games on their free time then the one that reviewing on youtube like neverchris and sonikdude have the same or have more credibility than reviewers that reviews in gaming mags and sites right?

Yeah, reviewers are biased. They give good scores for crap games like gta,halo,gears,cod4,mgs4,oblivion,mass effect and so on. Those games suck, they have boring graphics and poor controls. They aren't even fun! How on earth could that kind of crap get better reviews than a game like Mario Kart or wii sports.

I think that the reviewers are just dumb HD-fanboys who hate nintendo because it is better than their "hARdC0re"-systems.

I could give flaws onto those games you mentioned if I wanted to, but I dont want to...  so please dont troll on this thread.

I am agreeing with you and you say I am trolling. Wtf??

i've seen your post in another thread you're just a troll I had enough with you I wont reply to you anymore...

^^ Ninty fan vs Ninty fan. Never saw that coming.

Anyway, online and magazine reviews are just among the many sources of opinion. Ask officemates on what they're playing. Usually it's not the latest games, but something that they enjoy.

Sometimes, I like to think that we can just ignore one online review of our favorite games. But unfortunately, it brings down the total score on gamerankings. Sometimes there are reviewers who would just give a low score just to make a point, when all the criticisms he points out are also present on another game which he gave a higher score.

We've settled actually, if thats what you think. Its all about a big misunderstanding on my part I shouldnt be rash about a post and judge it right away.

WAIT... Wheres yoshi? I never seen his posts right now...