LOL MATURE said:
flames_of said: If the NextBox launches first, wouldn't it have 100% temporarly? That's over 45%
At Soriku.... The Wii2 seems a bit off topic.... |
here is where the English lesson picks up. Unfortunately I must leave for work (should have 10 minutes ago) so I will not go into detail. A. who said the next console will be released before others to grab 100%... Not me that's for sure. Even if I did "Get 45%" doesn't mean something else is taking 55% it just means it reached up to 45%. So if it releases first and grabs 100% me saying "getting 45%" wasnt wrong. Couldn't it be possible that 2 consoles get launched at the same time? Leaving 55% to be taken by who ever released long side? Isn't 55% > 45%? Wouldn't that then mean that 55% wasn't divided my 2 companies? Wouldn't all of that be supporting what I have said? When interpreting something try and cover what has been said. Instead of filling in your own words for someone else and then interpreting what you are saying what they are saying.
|
Yes!, but when you argue with a confined logic such as this, people will not understand. This only works if a third company does not enter the market.
Who's gonna drop out? - Nobody
Also why are you arguing about how market share is not a fixed number. Regardless if 30% of sales represents 50,000 or 200,000 , it is still 30% of the total possible number, is it not? - what the hell does that have to do with anything?
It is actually okay to admit your mistakes, there are tons of people in this world that never give in because they fear being wrong, when in reality they are just making an ass of themselves.
These people are really only trying to convince themselves. Anyone else can see through cyclical bullshit.
fact of the matter is.. if any gaming company ends up with 45% market share next gen, they will be the Winner out of the possible 3, or maybe even 4 competitors. You can bend the timelines according to launch windows all you want - but that would make no sense
Now would it?