They're either Kingdom Hearts fanboys, Final Fantasy haters, or they're lying.(granted there are always exceptions)

90 percent of the PS3 fanboys on this site would have easily chosen XIII over Verses before the megaton.

After, it was 90 percent in the other direction. Denying that isn't something you'll do.

BS and the Sony talking point fanbook. I'm beyond being countered with either one(not that you've spewed that particular brand of trite in my ear just now, but I'm just speaking generally).

Now, I'm not attacking you, I'm just saying that my point wasn't really that "every" person is liable for the acts of the majority. I'm just saying, yeah, what I said was right and bias obviously exists.

Basically what your post tells me is, "There are exceptions."

My response is, "Granted."

 Prior to this years E3, anytime I spoke of the 360 being a better JRPG console then the PS3 on other forums, I was always told off by guess which game; not Versus, not White Knight Chronicles, but none other then Final Fantasy XIII.

Now should I bring back up FFXIII in those said arguments, it is more often labelled as "inferior" compared to versus. I could only imagine what would happen if Versus went to 360(which it won't). Suddenly  WKC would become a million times better then either of them. 

Its called being a hypocrite. Whatever happened to Bioshock sucking?

Trust me when I tell you that the anecdotal evidence on this is so strong on this, that it single handedly proves our argument.

 I'll keep that in mind.

http://www.joystiq.com/2008/01/24/rockstar-finally-pins-gta-iv-delay-on-ps3-er-it-was-a-contrib/

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/ps3-partly-to-blame-for-gta-iv-delay

http://www.xbox365.com/news.cgi?id=GGLHGHLiHG08031236

http://www.blasteroids.com/news/news_item.cfm/12709/gtaivdelayps3

http://www.psu.com/Analyst--GTA-IV-delayed-due-to-PS3-complications--a000859-p0.php

http://kotaku.com/348603/rockstar-blames-ps3-in-part-for-gta-iv-delays

http://www.ripten.com/2007/08/12/gta-iv-delay-360-hard-drive-variable-ps3-development-difficulty-or-something-else/

Yes, I'll keep that in mind. 

"We determined today that a delay in the launch was essential to ensure the quality of 'Grand Theft Auto IV,' " Zelnick said in the conference call late Monday.

"The reason it is being delayed is almost strictly technological problems — not problems, but challenges," Zelnick said. He said it was a challenge to create an ambitious game for two very different platforms but declined to say what the hitches actually were. "The technology that we're developing for 'Grand Theft Auto IV' is pretty complex. It's a big game. There are technical challenges across the board on both PS3 and 360. Our intention is to create a game that is the same experience on both 360 and PS3. I know that there have been rumors in the market about frame-rate and some other issues. We don't think it's helpful or beneficial to go into what the technological issues are. We are pushing the envelope on both platforms."

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1566261/20070802/story.jhtml

Obviously Rockstar wont go into the specifics, but the circumstances still point very strongly towards the added complications for the PS3. All early alpha preview builds for the media were shown on the 360 and the 360 version was the lead version, which means that the 360 version was worked on and finished first. Then Zelnick said he wants both experiences to be the same so obviously the code further in development (360) is what the unfinished code (PS3) needs to be the same with. Its not rocket science.

ATTENTION VGCHARTZ!

I want you!

I want you, and everyone to read what CGI-Quality just wrote, and decide. I'd love to hear what others think about it. If they argree/disagree. Do you think I'm right, or him? Are his comments valid, or are they biased?

I can't tell you what I think just yet. You've probably figured it out. At the risk of seeming like I have no retort, I'll leave it at that. I'm fairly certain that others can point out the many false and flawed assumptions(or correct ones) in that post, without me having to do my usual hit-job on it.

So, VGChartz, what say you? You judge who is correct. Myself, a common PS3 hater, or CGI-Quality, a PS3 entheusiast and generally decent poster.

@ Zen and Shadowblind )

Talking about what fanboys said is senseless, because their statements never made any sense in the first place, so please stop the Sony-fan-ridiculing already.
We (those PS3 owners with a brain) got your point in one of the hundreds of posts about it you did before (especially @ Zen) and those that these posts are addressed to will never get it.

the thing you said all ps3 fanboys/defenders or whatever you called it care versus more now its a ps3 exclusive, thats false, and flamebait.

as for me versus its a nomura directed game, he is a master mind or at least know who get my taste in storyline and character design.

and now with that last post the flamebait its more obvious.

Sorry. Its a bit annoying when people don't understand points a first time. I guess it does seem that we're pointing at the PS3 population in general, when we really are just speaking to the people you mentioned eariler(I think Zen would be as well.) If my post quotes someone though, usually I am speaking to them only.