By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - I would like someone to explain to me when "life begins"

appolose said:

 

He asked when I thought human life began, so I answered.  And when did I toss out science?

From the moment that you started talking about spirits.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

Around the Network
appolose said:
NJ5 said:
appolose said:

I think perhaps the question could be better answered if we defined what exactly we meant by "life", so we could better answer when it begins. Someone up above said that perhaps it is when self-awareness arises. However, one is not self-aware if one is, for example, asleep (sure, you could be when your dreaming, but not otherwise). So we'd be forced to conclude that it wouldn't really be killing to cut off a sleeping man's head. Now, since we won't agree to that consequence, we'll have to use some other definition. If an entity can support itself, for instance, outside the womb, and thus has life, then any instance of of the body being unable to support itself would be disqualified as living, such as simply being on dialysis. Again, we won't agree to that definition because of that.

Now, one might argue that a person could wake up from his sleep, or be granted a kidney transplant, and thus has the potential to be self-aware and self-sustaining, and define life that way, so we could conclude that the two above cases are indeed living beings. That would grant to the moment of conception such potential too, and thus one would have to conclude it too is living. However,

Unfortunately, the definition I have for human life is going to be whenever the "spirit" enters (er, sorry for the religous answer); when exactly that is I would have to conclude it would be before the moment of conciousness, per the above reasons, and since it would seem somewhat arbitrary (if nothing else) for it to enter just any time before that, I will have to conclude at conception. Also, I want to be on the cautious side.

 

 

What is this "spirit" thing you talk about, which apparently magically exists before consciousness?

If we're going to throw science out the window, we might as well ignore everything we know about conception, which would render the anti-abortion argument useless anyway. No point in forbidding something we don't know is happening.

 

 

He asked when I thought human life began, so I answered. And when did I toss out science?

Dontcha love when people expect to have their view respected, but then crap all over yours and disrespect any form of belief you might hold?

 



bardicverse said:

Dontcha love when people expect to have their view respected, but then crap all over yours and disrespect any form of belief you might hold?

 

I didn't disrespect anyone's beliefs, I merely stated that assuming a "spirit" can exist before consciousness amounts to throwing science out the window. The same science which allows the debate to exist.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

NJ5 said:
appolose said:

 

He asked when I thought human life began, so I answered.  And when did I toss out science?

From the moment that you started talking about spirits.

 

 

While I would posit that it doesn't, that's a whole 'nother argument.

EDIT: And in any event, you would agree that my arguments against other positions don't bring in religion, yes?



Okami

To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made.  I won't open my unworthy mouth.

Christian (+50).  Arminian(+20). AG adherent(+20). YEC(+20). Pre-tribulation Pre-milleniumist (+10).  Republican (+15) Capitalist (+15).  Pro-Nintendo (+5).  Misc. stances (+30).  TOTAL SCORE: 195
  http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=43870 <---- Fun theology quiz
appolose said:
NJ5 said:
appolose said:

 

He asked when I thought human life began, so I answered.  And when did I toss out science?

From the moment that you started talking about spirits.

 

 

While I would posit that it doesn't, that's a whole 'nother argument.

I don't get it. You said you were giving a religious answer and even apologized for it. How am I contradicting what you said?

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

Around the Network
NJ5 said:
appolose said:
NJ5 said:
appolose said:

 

He asked when I thought human life began, so I answered.  And when did I toss out science?

From the moment that you started talking about spirits.

 

 

While I would posit that it doesn't, that's a whole 'nother argument.

I don't get it. You said you were giving a religious answer and even apologized for it. How am I contradicting what you said?

 

 

I'm saying that I don't think science and religion are necessarily exculusive.  Also, I was apologizing for what would probably be perceived as an annoying response.



Okami

To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made.  I won't open my unworthy mouth.

Christian (+50).  Arminian(+20). AG adherent(+20). YEC(+20). Pre-tribulation Pre-milleniumist (+10).  Republican (+15) Capitalist (+15).  Pro-Nintendo (+5).  Misc. stances (+30).  TOTAL SCORE: 195
  http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=43870 <---- Fun theology quiz
appolose said:

 

I'm saying that I don't think science and religion are necessarily exculusive.  Also, I was apologizing for what would probably be perceived as an annoying response.

If they aren't mutually exclusive, you should be able to explain what the "spirit" you were referring to is, and how it can exist before consciousness. That's the answer I was looking for when I replied to your post.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

NJ5 said:
bardicverse said:

Dontcha love when people expect to have their view respected, but then crap all over yours and disrespect any form of belief you might hold?

 

I didn't disrespect anyone's beliefs, I merely stated that assuming a "spirit" can exist before consciousness amounts to throwing science out the window. The same science which allows the debate to exist.

 

Its better worded that way. When we start throwing words like "magically" and other sorts of words that relate to fantasy realms, the comment becomes jagged. A lot of things occur before consciousness. Remember unconscious people (ie. coma) are still very much alive, no? Body parts are formed, the nucleus center of the brain is formed, but it is not conscious of itself or its surroundings. It does not quite know what it is, or where it is. You might define it as a subconscious state, much like a deep sleep in the REM stages. We could very easily be in danger in the conscious world, but completely unconscious to the fact as we dream about clowns with sharp teeth or being stuck in the next Ubisoft Petz game. (I'll take the prior to the latter!)

In regards to the overall pro-life/pro-choice, I think that either way is unfortunate. I feel that destroying a life because of reasons other than rape is bad, but bringing a child into the world and abusing/mistreating it is bad also. I also believe that children are the most terminal STD known to mankind =D

 



bardicverse said:

Its better worded that way. When we start throwing words like "magically" and other sorts of words that relate to fantasy realms, the comment becomes jagged. A lot of things occur before consciousness. Remember unconscious people (ie. coma) are still very much alive, no? Body parts are formed, the nucleus center of the brain is formed, but it is not conscious of itself or its surroundings. It does not quite know what it is, or where it is. You might define it as a subconscious state, much like a deep sleep in the REM stages. We could very easily be in danger in the conscious world, but completely unconscious to the fact as we dream about clowns with sharp teeth or being stuck in the next Ubisoft Petz game. (I'll take the prior to the latter!)

In regards to the overall pro-life/pro-choice, I think that either way is unfortunate. I feel that destroying a life because of reasons other than rape is bad, but bringing a child into the world and abusing/mistreating it is bad also. I also believe that children are the most terminal STD known to mankind =D

 

I wrote "magically" because there was no explanation at all of how this "spirit" thing could exist before consciousness.

BTW, I'm talking about consciousness in a quite broad way, subconscious included. That's why I said that it's hard to define the moment when consciousness begins, and that it's easier to point at some cases where it can't exist (for example, when no brain activity is present). Further advances in scientific knowledge could tell us even more about the pre-requisites for consciousness.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

NJ5 said:
appolose said:

 

I'm saying that I don't think science and religion are necessarily exculusive.  Also, I was apologizing for what would probably be perceived as an annoying response.

If they aren't mutually exclusive, you should be able to explain what the "spirit" you were referring to is, and how it can exist before consciousness. That's the answer I was looking for when I replied to your post.

 

 

I see.  From my understanding of the Bible, it's a non-physical entity that can make choices, and can exist apart from a physical body.



Okami

To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made.  I won't open my unworthy mouth.

Christian (+50).  Arminian(+20). AG adherent(+20). YEC(+20). Pre-tribulation Pre-milleniumist (+10).  Republican (+15) Capitalist (+15).  Pro-Nintendo (+5).  Misc. stances (+30).  TOTAL SCORE: 195
  http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=43870 <---- Fun theology quiz