He's right.  Do this again, but increase the sample size to 30+ - I'd really like to see the results of that (no, seriously!).  In fact, if you have the raw data available, we can test for statistical significance in the results with a larger sample.  Of course, it's critical that you make sure the samples are randomly selected.

I 2nd all of this! Specially the sig part...

GI is super biased. Ive actually read reviews of multiplatform games, and the Wii version was even said to play better than the rest, but got much lower scores simply because it wasnt HD.

 Funny.  I agree GI is biased but almost every magazine is.

I couldnt care less about those magazines, with bunch of fanboys that desire to be journalists.

@kowenicki, yes but you do expect a Magazine like ONM or Official Xbox magazine to be biased towards those products, game informer should adopt different approach.

Maybe they just don't like wii games. Big deal?

EGM is the online magazine were I read and semi trust the reviews. I make sure I get 4-5 reviews of a game. The key is to read the review not just look at the number. If it reads like something I would like and gets a 6 that means it may be a 8-9 for me. My favorite thing is the demo!! If it has a demo thats a good sign and then just play it that tells me more than any review

Then they shouldn't be reviewing them. A journalist that does reviews needs to go at things with a neutral stance. Disliking a game for the fact that it isn't in HD is not a neutral stance. Plain and simple.

All Magazines are by and large cogs in the industry's well oiled machine, and as such should be seen as tools of the corporations.

gamestop is actually getting getting better at wii news. yes its really behind the times but at least its got games like madworld, wario land and house of the dead up thier