robjoh on 11 July 2007
| mrstickball said: Yes, yes you are deprived. Civ is to nation building, as Sim City is to city building. The only difference is you can nuke your opponents in Civ, and is far more interesting. Why play Civ on a console? Because consoles don't need upgraded. I haven't got Civ4 because I can't plunk $1000 down on a new PC rig when I'd be buying it for that one game. Civ is turn-based, there'll be no real disadvantage to it on a console vs. PC if it remains turn based. Some of my favorite RTS's are on consoles, and I know that if they don't gimp (and I am sure they'll screw us console owners over on this), the actual aspects of Civ, it'll be fine. Just.....give me 6000 years of playing, plus space race, better battle sequences, and the same thing as C4, and I'd be happy. Heck, give me a graphical upgrade of C2 with better battle mechanics and I'd be fine. |
I am playing civ 4 on a 5 year old computer so no you don't need the latest equipment.
Other than that I have been playing civ since number 1, number 3 sucked, and I can't understand why anybody would chose to play it on a consol instead.
Buy it and pray to the gods of Sigs: Naznatips!
