| The Ghost of RubangB said: Asking a librarian how to ban books over and over and then making the librarian reapply for their job is very fishy. Asking somebody to fire a trooper over and over and then forcing them to relocate to another bureau is very fishy. I smell a repeat offender. |
Note, this thread is skating on thin ice as it is. Naz has made it very clear that political threads are no different than other threads, and that I have been a bit too leniant, particularly where it concerns baiting other people. This thread, particularly the devicive nature of the OP, is very much on the radar. I'm not giving you (or anyone) an official warning, just a caution (to everyone) to keep it toned down so I don't have to get involved as a moderator.
Now, as for the banning books thing, it has been debunked (and you can add that to the OP). The librarian was not the only person asked to submit a resignation..everyone in the administration was so that she could pick her staff as she came into office. This is actually a very very intelligent think to do, considering that she was potentially dealing with a number of folks who were appointed by the incumbant in her party she defeated, and particularly when you consider she ran on a message of "cleaning house". It was a blanket request to everyone who served at "the pleasure of the governor". Even factcheck has done an article on this saying she never attempted to have books banned in the first place. Dead issue.
As for the troopergate issue, I've looked at it quite a bit and it too is a non-issue. Even Monegan was quoted in the anchorage papers as saying neither her, her family, or her administration requested he be fired. At the absolute most she pressured for the guy to be fired (and even that isn't proven or really even eluded to) and never forced the issue. Totally within her legal rights as a citizen much less a Governor.
The stupidity of the issue is that if the facts had come in a different order you would be bitching that she was protecting her ex-brother-in-law scum-bag cop who received only a 5 day suspension after the review board determined that he had done a number of improper things (See below). The real story here is that she didn't go further, I wish she had fired Monegan for this, I wish had insisted Wooten be fired. Thats the real scandal here. I'm more dissapointed that she didn't outright demand he fire wooten or submit a resignation than anything else.
So the reason I say its a dead issue is because the review board did find him guilty of these things and people are not going to say "WOW she tried to have a crooked cop fired! How dare she!". Well some folks will but they've made up their minds, but the folks that matter, the swing voters, are going to be thoroughly underwhelmed by the case just like they were in Alaska where her approval rating soars above every other Governor in the US both before and after being picked for VP, and both before and after this "scandal"erupted.
Just to send this point home here is a quote from the AST when they suspended Wooten:
"The record clearly indicates a serious and concentrated pattern of unacceptable, and at times, illegal activity occurring over a lengthy period, which establishes a course of conduct totally at odds with the ethics of our profession,” Col. Julia Grimes, then head of Alaska State Troopers, wrote in March 1, 2006, letter suspending Wooten for 10 days. After the union protested it, the suspension was reduced to five days
-Emphasis added by me (obv)
Oh and here is the list of things he was suspended for:
OPM 101.070(A) - Unbecoming Conduct - 3 incidents
OPM 101.070(B) - Personal Conduct - 3 incidents
OPM 101.060(F) - Failure to Perform Duties Properly, Use of Government Property - 1 incident
OPM 101.070(C) - Conformance to Laws - 2 incidents
OPM 101.070(F) - Use of Alcohol - 1 incident
OPM 103.030(A) - Operation to be preudent and lawful - 1 incident
What the F@$% do you have to do to get fired? Good Lord.
This is a non-issue.
Sources:
Records - Palin's Interview - Investigators notes on the Interview - Notes On Todd's Interview - Complaint E-Mail from Palin about Wooten - Info On Wooten quoting from suspension letter - Letter Suspending Wooten
Frivolous by the very definition.
Since I'm already at it lets go ahead and address the rest of the list:
mother-in-law considering voting for Barack Obama - Who cares?
Palin's Husband Has DWI -22 years ago...before they were married...again who cares?
Iraq War is a "task that is from god" - Horribly taken out of context, the quote from even the left-leaning MSNBC article you linked explicitly states that she is asking people to pray that this is true..she isn't stating it as a fact. She also clarified this recently in pointing out that she was not saying that we should pray god is on our side but rather pray that we are on god's side. A lot different in context..but not your point I take it? You object to her religion period..which is fine but a lot of people admire and respect it..in fact I would go so far as to say yourself and others are fairly bigotted on this issue.
"vetting or lack thereof" - Ironically I've heard it argued that her problems have been an asset to the campaign...the attacks on her are afterall what made her so popular =P
But I guess we can address the issue directly as well. The fact is that the way vetting for veeps is done is a batch process you take prospective choices and dig into their pasts and see who survives. Specifically the McCain had a team headed by former Reagan White House Counsel Arthur Culvahouse and she was whittled down from a group of 21 with information being dug up on every last one of them and narrowed down. The top 6 of the group were actually informed that they were in consideration and were given a questionaire to fill out. Furthermore the only people who could possibly know how well she was vetted have actually gone on the record as saying "Everything that has come out over the last couple of days is information that we already knew — that came during this vetting process". And the simple fact of the matter is that Culvahouse was spotted in Juneau well before the pick back in early July about 2 months before the pick.
Palin: "If Pledge Of Allegiance Was Good Enough For Founding Fathers, It's Good Enough For Me":
Great and I suppose we should crucify her right next to Obama for thinking there are 57 states? At least her mistake wouldn't have been cought by my 6 year old nephew (true story).
So are you about done with this? Can I lock this trash? Or should I just wait until you give me a good reason?
PS - If you do want to keep this open still then please at least update the OP to reflect what has been shown to be debunked crap (ie pretty much all of it).














