forevercloud3000 said: @Krill I never said it was their only reason. Yet I do believe Sony cares more about their customers then most want to give them credit for. Why does everyone believe that every big named company is heartless and only wishes to rob you? Some companies can maintain good business-customer relationship and be profitable too.
Just look at developers for instance. Kojima stayed exclusive to the PS3 even though many told him he could make more money by going MultiPlat(eww). He ignored them because you know why? He is LOYAL, he cares about the FANS! Some companies have compassion you know, If I ever have a company I will run it accordingly as such... |
No one trusts a company because they cannot be trusted. A corporation, by law, has to make as much profit as possible. A corporation is like a person (well, technically, a corporation IS a person) who has no conscience.
In fact, when a corporation gets to Sony's size it's very much impossible for it to have a conscience. Why? Because Howard Stringer isn't incharge. Neither is Kaz Hirai, or any of the other high-rollers. The people incharge of a corporation are the stock-holders. The people who look at the graphs, and they shout "buy, buy, buy" or "sell, sell, sell" depending on what they see. And they get very angry when they see something they don't like in a corporation that they have stock in, and so Howard's nice job, and cozy flat are on the line.
Essentially, if Sony wanted to be nice, and sell at a loss because it would benefit their customers. Every single person who was involved in that decision would be out on their arse within days. It's because of stock holders that we have so many issues with our planet's environment. Many of these corporation's chairmen would like to become more green and help out the planet, but the vultures who care about nothing more than the profit margins prevent it from happening.
(I believe that it's also impossible to have a democracy that uses this corporate model. As, eventually, a few corporations will become very powerful, and very rich, and they have the means to get politicians to vote for the things that they support. This means that even in a democracy, the rich are still the powerful, and that isn't democracy. (I expect to see nordlead use his new influence around this site very shortly, I mean, he's already got TalonMan making changes for him)).