Hello

I'm sad.....

I've just found that no co-op will be available for KILLZONE 2 at launch....

http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2008/08/22/killzone-2-co-op-to-be-patched-after-launch-bots-confirmed/

I'll wait and see if it is confirmed, but you would think for $60 million+ they could allocate a few funds for co-op play.....

Wow co-op for a FPS. That must be one of the most useless features ever. Seriously. I would love to know how many people use this.

Only a rumour we will see when the game is launched next year and what reviews reveal.

Co-op in Halo 3, Gears of War, both GRAW's and both R6V games were awesome.

Everybody that has friends uses it. In nowdays co-op it's a key feature in every game that comes out.

Didn't you notice? If not you should pay more attention.

Multiplayer FPS is Deathmatch and Capture The Flag / Objective play. Everything else is pointless. I want games to do the important things right, not check out bullet points of features "that a games has in nowdays".

Seriously coop play for a FPS that was designed as a cinematic single-player experience for ONE player is as pointless as Multiplayer in a game like Uncharted. (*)

(*) This may be different for games that are designed for multiple characters in the single-player campaign Army of Two is an example for this.

It's pointlesse for you, not for me and millions more, I like to share my gaming experience with friend(s).

So developers are all DUMB because they all are including co-op in their games.

I guess you are the smart one. Ok man, no problem, whatever you say.

Remember Contra?

So, Gears of war. If you don't have a second player, you have a computer controlled guy with you the whole time. Dom.

Anyway, Co-Op was the key feature missing from CoD4, and it's awesome in any FPS or TPS. It's fantastic. You've just never had a really good co-op session. If you did, for instance, play through Gears of War with a friend, you'd understand why some people really like that feature.

Calling it a bullet point, or unimportant, is the same as calling online play a bullet-point, or unimportant. It's actually great, it is significant that the game is missing it. It's not gamebreaking(see CoD4) but it is important.

As for how many people use it...well I know for Gears of War, everybody I know that has the game, uses it, and it is the only reason the game has so much replayability. You can let your dad, or your girlfriend, or whoever, play player 2. The game is designed ground up for smart co-op, even allowing for you to split up at certain points in the game, and take different routes. It is definitely the reason the game is still so highly lauded, and the fact that you were so harsh on co-op, means that you haven't experienced a great session of it, and by "great" I mean standard.

That, or you're making excuses for the game.

Because though a shooter can be fantastic without co-op(RE4, CoD4) there is no doubt that these games would have been played longer, and enjoyed more if that deceptively hard to insitute feature was added.

You wanna know why Gears kicks so much ass? It's the best co-op shooter in existance.

You've got a bad argument here Kyros.

For the record, I really hope that KZ2 does end up with co-op.

Hmm.Thas big dissapointment.First I bought Ut 3 for co-op,but there wasnt.Then resistance, well it was pretty poor.Now maybe I buy Cod 4 for Ps3 tho I have it at Pc.