By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - 1up Too Human Review: Worse than Haze AND Lair

Bagaren85 said:
Eh. Dont have big hops on TH, but i trust IGNs as a site more than IUP. And iGN gave a good score, what was it. 7.8? :O


IGN > IUP - Always-

 

 

There were some good and some bad from the demo, but overall, I walked away from the Demo liking the game.  I jsut ran thru DMC4 and I actually liked that game, and Too Human seems to be in that mode of play, with the added benefits of more RP factors and loot.  I can see this one expanding in some DLC and also in Too Human 2 to provide a better experience with them taking the good and filtering the bad.  Overall, I'll say again...the demo really hit the spot for me, and reviews at Game Pro and IGN (I'm normally a 3-year subcriber) are sources that I usually get my info from.  Ther eare some negative reviews, such as the one from 1Up or even Gamespy, but many of the things they pointed out I've already seen in the demo, such as gettign the controls down.



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder

Around the Network

IGN gives it a 7.8.

Good.

This bodes well for the less than 75 metacritic I predicted.

Dyack deserves this, he talks/ed too much shit.



SnakeEyez said:
starcraft said:
SnakeEyez said:

I find it funny that it's ok when 1up gives a bad review to a PS3 game, but if it's a hyped up 360 game, people cry foul. Too bad that Too Human might turn out bad, a friend of mine was going to buy it and I was gonna play it at his house.

Talk about hyped 360 games elsewhere, we are in here discussing Too Human.

Umm, Too Human was/is a hyped up 360 game, thats y I brought up the hipocrisy that 360 fanboys have for reviews from 1up or any other source (not just from this forums, in general). Also, did u read the rest of my post? I talked about Too Human so... yea, IDK y u called me out on it.

Because relative to any significant exclusive on ANY platform, Too Human wasn't hyped.  Indeed, until the last two weeks, many people forgot it existed.

It certainly didn't receive anywhere near the level of official and unofficial hype Haze and Lair (well the official hype stopped when Sony realised it sucked) did.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

DMeisterJ said:
IGN gives it a 7.8.

Good.

This bodes well for the less than 75 metacritic I predicted.

Dyack deserves this, he talks/ed too much shit.

If the game is shit it deserves a shit score.

But by and large Dyack and SK have an awesome history, and I have a lot of respect for them.

The good news is, they are locked into the sequels, and you would expect camera issues, menu confusion etc to be taken care of in TH2 and TH3.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

starcraft said:
SnakeEyez said:
starcraft said:
SnakeEyez said:

I find it funny that it's ok when 1up gives a bad review to a PS3 game, but if it's a hyped up 360 game, people cry foul. Too bad that Too Human might turn out bad, a friend of mine was going to buy it and I was gonna play it at his house.

Talk about hyped 360 games elsewhere, we are in here discussing Too Human.

Umm, Too Human was/is a hyped up 360 game, thats y I brought up the hipocrisy that 360 fanboys have for reviews from 1up or any other source (not just from this forums, in general). Also, did u read the rest of my post? I talked about Too Human so... yea, IDK y u called me out on it.

Because relative to any significant exclusive on ANY platform, Too Human wasn't hyped.  Indeed, until the last two weeks, many people forgot it existed.

It certainly didn't receive anywhere near the level of official and unofficial hype Haze and Lair (well the official hype stopped when Sony realised it sucked) did.

Too Human was hyped.

Too Human and Haze are the exact opposite.  Haze wasn't hyped at all, but lots of people put stock into Too Human because of Silicon Knights' previous work (Eternal Darkness).

Lots of people were hyping this game to a very large extent.  Only when we had learned that the game would be mediocre to bad by most standards a few months ago did the hype train screech to a halt. 

Haze stopped being hyped when it was first previewed as being terrible (IGN December 2007).  But this game was being hyped up until the first preview of the game came out a few weeks ago.



Around the Network

^DMJ, there's no winning with him, I just gave up.



Looks like other websites are giving it avg. reviews. Looks like its only worth a rent. 360 owners should save their money for Mercs 2, that game looks amazing.



Guess I'll give braid another play through :)



fine. i will admit it. It failed to meet expectations. But it is not as bad as Lair or Haze.



Liar said:
fine. i will admit it. It failed to meet expectations. But it is not as bad as Lair or Haze.

 

 how do you know?



Feel free to add me as your friend-PSN ID: Bobo012893