By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - If the kingdom heats franchise belongs to disney why isn't there any.......

Kasz216 on 12 August 2008
ctk495 said:
Million said:
That's garbage KH couldn't possibly be exclusivley owned by Disney , the game is a result of a collboration , it has both Disney and Final Fantasy characters . If Square Enix leaves KH it doesn't exist anymore.

 

Lol I hope sc comes and replies to this post I am sure he will make like thousand reasons why kingdom hearts belongs to disney :P

You don't need a thousand... you just need the one page with all the rights on it that specifically states it all belongs to disney.

It's likely in your KH instruction booklet.

Not that it matters.  Disney and SE will be of the same mind as to where to put KH.  Where they think it will make the most money.

 



Around the Network
SmokedHostage on 12 August 2008

Kingdom Hearts is a video game. Maybe if there was a Kingdom Hearts movie, there would be more.



Pixel Art can be fun.

Obliterator1700 on 12 August 2008
ctk495 said:
Million said:
That's garbage KH couldn't possibly be exclusivley owned by Disney , the game is a result of a collboration , it has both Disney and Final Fantasy characters . If Square Enix leaves KH it doesn't exist anymore.

 

Lol I hope sc comes and replies to this post I am sure he will make like thousand reasons why kingdom hearts belongs to disney :P
Soriku will come aswell...

 

 



sc94597 on 12 August 2008

Also notice the cellphone game made by Disney and not square enix. If they both owned the game, there probably would have been a dispute. Oh and I don't really think Final Fantasy Characters have a big impact on Kingdom Hearts.



Obliterator1700 on 12 August 2008
sc94597 said:
Also notice the cellphone game made by Disney and not square enix. If they both owned the game, there probably would have been a dispute. Oh and I don't really think Final Fantasy Characters have a big impact on Kingdom Hearts.

Are you talking about coded?

Around the Network
sc94597 on 12 August 2008
Obliterator1700 said:
sc94597 said:
Also notice the cellphone game made by Disney and not square enix. If they both owned the game, there probably would have been a dispute. Oh and I don't really think Final Fantasy Characters have a big impact on Kingdom Hearts.

 

Are you talking about coded?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_Hearts_(series)#Games

Its the Vcast game.

V CAST

A Kingdom Hearts game was developed exclusively for V CAST, Verizon Wireless's broadband service, and was released on October 1, 2004 in Japan and on February 4, 2005 in the United States.[36] It was one of the launch games for the V CAST services.[37] The game, developed by Superscape and published by Disney Mobile with no involvement from Square Enix, features the original Kingdom Hearts's gameplay, modified for the input method of mobile phones.[38]

The first section begins with the protagonist of the original Kingdom Hearts, Sora, shipwrecked on a seemingly uninhabited island, his friends Goofy and Donald missing. Sora must find a way to escape the island, as well as reuniting with Donald and Goofy. Reception of the first playable mission pack was mixed. The game was criticized for its awkward controls and limited availability. The visual appeal was praised; GameSpot stated Sora "is very detailed and well animated" and complimented the 3D environments.[39]

 



ctk495 on 12 August 2008
sc94597 said:
Also notice the cellphone game made by Disney and not square enix. If they both owned the game, there probably would have been a dispute. Oh and I don't really think Final Fantasy Characters have a big impact on Kingdom Hearts.

Whoa are you serious? kingdom hearts appeals to the core since it has the FF characters plus without square enix kingdom hearts would be a  average disney game the design of sora,riku,kairi look like square characters not like disney's.

 



Kasz216 on 12 August 2008

Personally my question always is....

Why do people think it matters. Why is Disney more likely to put it on the Wii and Square the PS3.

Don't you think they're both go for whichever platform they thought would make them the most money. Rather then pretend they both have a side and a stake in the console fanboy war?

Whether it goes to Wii, PS3(likely with a 360 port) or even like... DS will depend on whatever they think will make them the most money... and who knows what they think will do that?



sc94597 on 12 August 2008
ctk495 said:
sc94597 said:
Also notice the cellphone game made by Disney and not square enix. If they both owned the game, there probably would have been a dispute. Oh and I don't really think Final Fantasy Characters have a big impact on Kingdom Hearts.

Whoa are you serious? kingdom hearts appeals to the core since it has the FF characters plus without square enix kingdom hearts would be a  average disney game the design of sora,riku,kairi look like square characters not like disney's.

 

What soriku said. ALso Disney owns all new characters that are made. So even though Nomura made the designs for Sora,Riku,etc Disney owns them. Also I seriously don't see how having a few Final Fantasy characters makes the game core? Wouldn't that be the gameplay and the story that makes the game core. I wouldn't really compare KH without final fantasy Characters to High School Musical.

 



konnichiwa on 12 August 2008
Soriku said:
konnichiwa said:

Square Enix sells the merchandise..

 

Why can't Disney sell it as well? It's Disney's series...don't see why they can't advertise it at Disney World.

@Obliterator

No I won't. Unelss someone foolishly happens to respond to that in a matter we don't want :P

 

But SE invented the characters (Sora, Squal, Cloud etc) isn't it normal that they have the right to sell it?  And I don't know Kingdom hearts figurines in Disney World?  The game maybe for some people kind of childish but I don't see many 8 years old playing that game and if you are +10 the most kids don't want to go to Disneyland anymore;..I guess.