this game is not on the same level as hazlo. some ps3 fans, for whatever reason, saw that haze was shaping up to be less than great and still were all aboard the hype train insisting it be a great game and a great seller. While some x360 fans might have hyped up too human to a small extent, that died off once the demo hit... hell even before that i didn't see much mention of it. In this regard I think ps3 fans here could learn something from x360 fans. That said, I really want to try this along with castle crashers.

 what about banjo?

All your posts are mutually exclusive. You can get it right a thousand times and get it wrong once, and you've successfully trolled.

Your post earlier, directed at me, seemed to add nothing to the conversation. It was an accusation, that you didn't feel the need to explain. It could have and likely was founded from fanboyistic motivations.

We can't judge you on what you think. Good intentions don't matter. It's what you do that matters.

As for your assertion that I downplayed a 6.75 rating, I didn't. I said many times in this post that I do now, and always have thought the game will suck.

My only assertion on this topic, or at least my main one is that most knowledgable Xbox 360 owners, who followed the development and previews of the game, had a general idea that this game was not gonna rank AAA status from some reviewers.

Your original post has nothing to do with the trolling you did afterwards. Tell me, since you don't think making throw away passive-agressive comments without backup or reasoning after another posters long post that obviously took time for him to write, that also contains the assertion that said person is a fanboy and simply using "damage control" to downplay a game's review, classifies as trolling, then what exactly do you think trolling is?

You've made two very dire incorrect assertions here.

A. I never downplayed the score. In fact, I never commented on the score at all in the post you quoted. I simply said the game wasn't hyped and had poor previews. In another post I stated that I believe the game is probably not that great.

B. You assert that someone who trolls can't also make a regular post. I actually try to bait trolls into making posts with thought and reasoning behind them, because often the reason they troll is that they can't form a cohesive argument to experess their opinion. You made a regular post, yes, then you replied to my post with a troll.

Sounds like downplaying here. Nothing personal though.

Is trolling. Not to mention it's based on incorrect assumptions. At best, it's attempting to marginalize my post with fanboyistic motivations. At worst it's a meritless troll attempting to offend me.

If you're gonna be a real poster, you have to be a real poster all of the time. Not 99 percent of the time. Always.

You build a thousand bridges and kill one man, you're not a bridgebuilder, you're a murderer.

As for this particular game. It doesn't matter. This discussion ceased being about the game when you responded to my post with Sounds like downplaying here. Nothing personal though.

No matter how much you talk or reason your way into thinking that you were in the right to post that, you weren't. You can't change that. No amount of reasoning can change it.

To switch completely off topic for a second, I agree, numerical scores don't matter. However, from reading previews, I wouldn't rent this game if it had a 90 average.

Thanks for responding, btw.

Just face it, the guilty dog barks the loudest.