Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
NeoRatt said: As part of the fall update they are allowing all games to be installed...
So, I guess the answer is yes.
The nice thing on 360 is that this is optional and not a requirement to play. |
Only because not all 360s have hard drives. Installs make games load faster and therefore are a feature. Devs love them. Sometimes we need to erase installs to play new games. We don't cry.
|
When you have a lot of games and more then one of the same console it is unfeasible to copy games to a hard drive. Managing storage and installs is not something I am interested in for a large portion of my games. I like optional installs because it allows me to decide which games I really want on my hard drive vs. ones I would never want on my hard drive.
As for load times that is only a problem with blu-ray players in the PS3 because they are that much slower then the hard drive. It was a trade-off Sony chose in the design (storage over performance) which is fine, but it creates an issue that people end up having to do maintainence on their system whether they like it or not. Installs should be optional, not required.
As for developers, of course they love hard drives. It is easier to right code and not be forced to make it perform as efficiently as possible. I've been involved with software development for 18 years now, and if you ask me whether I want more storage or right more efficient code I will take storage everytime (and literally, I have gambled on that with software I have created). It is much cheaper and faster to right regular code rather then efficient code (That doesn't make developers lazy, it is giving the people paying for the development options to reduce development cost, for those of you who like to call devs lazy). And with some consoles being more complex to develop for then others, that could be the difference between a profitable and unprofitable game.