By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - CNET.com - "Why Microsoft Should Aquire Sony's Gaming Division"

Reasonable said:
MS could also do with buying Google and other companies that are giving it trouble around its core business, and Apple would be handy too.

I mean, its not the analysis is flawed as such, its just that you could say that about any competitive company - hell, all Sony has to do is buy Nintendo and the job's done for this generation, right?

Or maybe Apple buys MS entertainment division and shuts down Zune, etc. and uses 360 to get into gaming...

What's missing, apart from a few too vague statements in my opinion, is any real reason for Sony to make such a sale, big losses or not at this stage in time, particularly given how crucial PS3 is right now for BR adoption.

 

M$ can not afford Google, Nintendo, Apple, or Sony. These companies, and many others, are the world's power houses and therefore would cost as much as a small country to purchase. None of them can afford one another.

As for Blu-ray it  has made some large increases as of late. It has held about 7 - 8% of the US disc based movie market gaining between 7.5 - 9 million dollars in revenue each week. BR adoption doesnt seem to bad for how much it costs.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Around the Network

japan AND europe.

also i doubt microsoft can't afford it.
they could buy even yahoo.



Article written by a retard.

If this would occur then Nintendo would bearly have compitition at all.

Buying SCE would be too costly for MS, I though MS was trying to rake in a profit, not give SONY money, SONY wouldn't sell SCE for a few nickles you know.... MS has lost too much money on their 2 consoles and buying 3rd party games already.

SCE is actually becoming quite profitable right now.



4 ≈ One

disolitude said:
Pristine20 said:
disolitude said:
Pristine20 said:
disolitude said:
Why would they need Sony gaming division? Cell has shown to be underachiving, sony studios arent really moving consoles with their games, they already share pretty much all the great exclusives....

Bluray is the only aspect which could seem interesting but even that would be counter-productive of their goal for digital distribution.

It eliminates competition. Why did you think M$ tried to acquire yahoo? It has nothing to do with cell's performance. They could just use sony's studios to make xbox games and maybe keep the playstation name to remain strong in JP.

I don't think sony will be selling by the way.

 

MS went after yahoo to compete with google in the search market. Yahoo was not MS's competition at all. But yes, it would eliminete competition for 360 I guess... but who of us consumers would want that?

 

 

 I won't want that but you have to admit that it will be good for M$ because with the path Nintendo has taken. M$ would have the whole ps360 crowd in its pockets and not even have to worry about buying/losing 3rd party exclusives because their games would be built for 360 only or wii only for the most part. They could increase xbox live to $100/year and not worry much because their customers would have no choice.

They tried to aquire yahoo to compete with google for advertising $$$ because they are trailing behind google big time.

 

MS just started doing search...ofcourse they are trailing google. Aquiring yahoo wuld have put them at 40% of the search market, then things would have gotten interesting so that was a well thought out purchase. But purchasing Sony is not...

What is Sony doing that they could use to cut in to Wii's marketshare? They would make it much easier for themselves to get the HD market but would still not compete with the Wii.

Purchasing SCE would give them access to people who still cling to the ps2 and a 100% monopoly on HD gaming just the way M$ likes it. All the undecided b/w ps3 and 360 will automatically purchase the 360 because there's no other choice and when the price drops to the $199, expect 360 sales to shoot through the roof even in JP because there won't be much of a choice for those who don't want to play games with extreme color pallettes and goofy characters.

Also, wii marketshare would pose a 0% issue. Why?

1. 3rd parties are supporting both ps3 & 360 architecture now for multiplats, it would be easierand shorten dev times to have just one console with the userbase of 2.

2. With HD consoles still getting as much or even more 3rd party support in this mess, you can only imagine what would happen if there was only 1 such console not 2 competing for a nicghe.

3. Its very likely that the 360 sales would be on par with the wii when the 360 pricepoint lower. t everyone wants a wii and some who bought one have returned to the traditional system like you.

4. Like M$ has said over and over, Sony is their real competition as things stand. Why would they be trying to acquire FFXIII nt FF crystal Chronicles? Why get playstation-centric exclusives? You get the point. Buying out the competion gives you the power to do whatever

 I'm pretty sure sony would buy out M$ game studios as well if they had the money.



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Jo21 said:
japan AND europe.

also i doubt microsoft can't afford it.
they could buy even yahoo.

They were offering $44 billion for Yahoo, which is more than Sony is worth. I mean the whole of Sony, not just SCE.

The reason they didn't buy Yahoo was because Yahoo's CEO acted like a spoiled child, almost to the point of being fired by Yahoo's shareholders. Nothing about money.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

Around the Network
Dgc1808 said:

Article written by a retard.

If this would occur then Nintendo would bearly have compitition at all.

Buying SCE would be too costly for MS, I though MS was trying to rake in a profit, not give SONY money, SONY wouldn't sell SCE for a few nickles you know.... MS has lost too much money on their 2 consoles and buying 3rd party games already.

SCE is actually becoming quite profitable right now.

Well said.

 

 



Wow..this is probably the stupidest post I've ever read.

MS will never buy Sony..Sony would never sell itself to MS.

I don't think I've ever met this big of a fanboy in my life...seriously. I mean..seriously guys..just, wow.

I find it funny that they bring this up too, because lets go back 5 years, and would this not be the other way around? "Why Sony should buy Microsofts Gaming Division" or Nintendos or whatever..5 years ago, Nintendo was going down the tube, XBOX was getting crushed by PS2. Now, suddenly since Sony brought their console out a little bit later, all the sudden they're a failure.

Just..wow. I can't even post anymore on this. Wow..wow wow wow.



NJ5 said:

So here are the numbers:

Nintendo is worth $67 billion.
Sony (as a whole) is worth around $40 billion
.

And for reference:

Google - $148 billion
Microsoft - $239 billion

Microsoft probably has enough cash-on-hand to make a cash-only purchase of SCE... If they did a cash+stock purchase, they wouldn't have to break a sweat to buy it. Of course, they'd have to get regulatory approval, which shouldn't be a huge problem right now as Nintendo is owning both of them.

This is of course academic without the support of Sony's investors, which is probably one of the reasons why Sony is now very careful with their PS3 strategy. We don't need to assume something as dramatic as a Microsoft-buyout, their shareholders could simply force them to sell off some assets (some studios for example).

 

Its not that simple. Sony's asset value>>>>>>Nintendo.

 Nintendo seems worth more currently because they're very profitable. Why do you think forbes ranks Sony way higher than nintendo?



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

So.

Their saying:
Microsoft shoul spend billions of dollars for nothing?



Pristine20 said:
NJ5 said:

So here are the numbers:

Nintendo is worth $67 billion.
Sony (as a whole) is worth around $40 billion
.

And for reference:

Google - $148 billion
Microsoft - $239 billion

Microsoft probably has enough cash-on-hand to make a cash-only purchase of SCE... If they did a cash+stock purchase, they wouldn't have to break a sweat to buy it. Of course, they'd have to get regulatory approval, which shouldn't be a huge problem right now as Nintendo is owning both of them.

This is of course academic without the support of Sony's investors, which is probably one of the reasons why Sony is now very careful with their PS3 strategy. We don't need to assume something as dramatic as a Microsoft-buyout, their shareholders could simply force them to sell off some assets (some studios for example).

 

Its not that simple. Sony's asset value>>>>>>Nintendo.

Nintendo seems worth more currently because they're very profitable

 

It's easier to buy Sony out considering they are worth less on the stock market.  But Sony gets more revenue than Ninty does meaning its easier for them to continuously buy their own stock to keep them from a hostile takeover. 

 

Technically Ninty is a bigger company than Sony but Sony earns more revenue which is apparent in the finance reports they report.