in 2004 he got 12%, I predict higher this year.

Well your voting for McCain... so Obama won't get 5% of the vote in your book either.

What's a partial birth abortion?  Are they like... halfway sticking out, and then you chop off the head?  I didn't know anything could ever be considered "partially born."  I thought there was either a birth or a miscarriage.  You die before or after the birth.  Unless it's one of those crazy cases where the umbilical cord is strangling the baby, but they can usually bust an emergency C-section and save the fucker.

In 2004, Nader got ~1% of the total votes cast. (411,304 to be exact) and he, along with Bob Barr and Cynthia McKinney, will be more irrelevant than ever this year. They will probably all together receive 1%.

It's not a real term to be honest, the correct term is intact dilation and extraction but partial birth abortion is used by pro-life people to give the impression that the fetus has been born thus making it seem like a person rather than a fetus. It's a late term (20-24 weeks usually) abortion that involves partial removal of the fetus before killing it. I also support partial birth abortion because there is no logical reason not to other than the seemingly reflexive 'Eww its partially sticking out when they kill it' that people seem to have.

Ummm, are you serious???  Like, REALLY???

Bush got 51% of the vote in 2004...

Kerry got 49% of the vote...

So where on God's green earth does that 12% figure fit into the equation?

Actually a vote for Nader is a vote for McCain... because the only people who contemplate voting for Nader each year are the far lefties who complain that the Democratic candidate isnt liberal enough for them... they'd prefer someone even more liberal than Obama, like Kucinich for instance  *looks at Rubang*

So by Nader running he takes away potential Dem votes, although he was hardly a factor in the last 2 elections... nothing like Ross Perot back in '92 who basically helped to hand Clinton the presidency.

That sentence pretty much speaks for itself.... cuz it's not like people are morally appalled by abortion, partial or otherwise... nah they just have a problem with it being too gross after the baby is at a certain point in development.   Silly Pro-Lifers, when will they finally grow a pair and deal with it?

Perhaps I should have phrased it better, there is no logical reason to single out intact dilation and extraction. I can think of no reason why this form of abortion has been singled out above any other.

Of course the actual debate on abortion is way deeper than that, so you can keep your sarcasm to yourself.