masschamber said: Gears 2, it doesn't look much better than the first perse, especially given that I'd stand by it as the best looking game on consoles, but the scoop seems so much grander, Killzone 2 takes nextgen gray to a whole new level of looking dead, though it still looks great .... anyone have any frame rate info about the 2 games as I find framerate very important in how a game looks I mean killzone 1 would have looked fantastic if it ran at more than about 10 frame per second if killzone 2 runs at 60 steady it would be far more impressive than gears, but if both are 30 gears wins |
Does this answer your question
IGN rates E3
Best Graphics Technology:
Gears of War 2
Developer: Epic Games
Publisher: Microsoft
Release Date: November 2008
Shown at E3 on: X360
Also Coming to: N/A
There were a lot of beautiful looking games at E3 2008, but none held our eye as long as Gears of War 2. Some very deserving titles made our short list, but at the end of the day, it was Epic's uncanny ability to squeeze magic out of the (upgraded) Unreal Engine 3 that wowed us most.
From the updated soft-body physics to the fantastic water effects and realistic cover destruction, Gears 2 reminded us why Tim Sweeney and the tech team at Epic are some of the best in the business. Not only does Gears 2 look pretty in pictures and HD videos, it also runs like a dream. In our lengthy time playing the Horde co-op mode at a Microsoft event at E3, we saw no slowdown, tearing, crashes or hiccups whatsoever. Here's hoping the finished product looks as good on launch day as it did in L.A
Runner(s)-Up:
Crysis: Warhead (PC - Electronic Arts)
Fallout 3 (X360 - Bethesda Softworks)
Killzone 2 (PS3 - Sony Computer Entertainment)