EDIT: This is just about myself, not other users who have issues with Ubisoft.
I'm serious. Some companies state that if employees mention online that they work for that company, they have to make it clear any comments are just their opinion and not the company's position. The reason is that those companies know those comments could easily be mistaken for the company's official position, even if the employee does not claim it is.
Ubisoft may not have that rule, but the fact is that moderator worked for the company and was on their official site. That is reason to think what he says could be the company's position. And he never once stated it was just his opinion. The closest thing he's done is state after the fact that he never stated that it was the official company word. But he never stated it was not.
This says to me he was trolling. He wanted people to get riled up.
But since that was just one asshole, and not the company, it's clear Ubisoft doesn't think the Wii audience is nothing but lazy impulse buyers, which that guy claimed in so many words. The fact that Ubisoft has been working on Red Steel 2 for months, and is not using the Motion Plus to make sure the controls work this time, shows that they think more of gamers than just sheep. This is also indicated by them holding back the new Splinter Cell game, instead of just rushing it out. Plus they showed they are willing to publish core Wii games for smaller developers (unlike whatever company told HVS to crap out The Conduit).
In short, I was tricked into thinking Ubisoft was a bunch of assholes. It was just one asshole using his position in the company to give his trolling credibility. My issue with Ubisoft is no more, as it was based on false information.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








