By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - If Iran becomes a nuclear power?

ssj12 on 27 July 2008
DTG said:
Who cares if they become a Nuclear power? I believe the US is one yet we aren't pushing for it's dismantlement eventhough the US is the only country to have ever used a nuclear weapon. In fact I hope that Iran becomes a Nuclear power capable of threatening US safety as it would hopefully counter US imperialist ambitions.

 

the US might have usesd a weapons against another but there are many countries armed and have tested their own. Russia only has like 5 less nukes then the US.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Around the Network
megaman79 on 27 July 2008
Kasz216 said:
megaman79 said:
Depends on whether you watch Fox News. Israel has 120 nukes, had them for over 30 yrs so is that a problem to you? US, of course the only country insane enough to test them on actual people. If you learn about security threats you would know that competitors are simply out doing each other. India / Pakistan, US / Russia, etc. The real question is whether a country is legitimatly able to develop Nuclear power, as an energy supply, without paranoid lunatics assuming, as in iraq, that they are actually up to no good.

 

If Iran wasn't up to no good they would accept the UKs deal to have nuclear power plants not only for free... but actually getting paid to have them.

Israel hasn't ever threatened to wipe a nation off the earth by any means neccesairy either. Nukes are a problem. You can't just take them from the countries that have them though because they have... well nukes.

 

Citation, evidence of this free plant offer? Firstly the UK would not be an adequte business partner considering past history between Iran and UK. News previously suggested distrust of Western developed tech hence Russian involvement. Secondly other than rhetoric, a technique famously demonstrated through Bush speeches, what are they actually doing? Considering Iraq, are people willing to believe anything coming from the media or western gov. sources any more.

Thirdly, sanctions work though dieing of hunger, loosing jobs and the in ability to actually motivate change are the problem here.



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

MrBubbles on 27 July 2008

Saddam wanted wmds, in the past tried to make them, and was acting like he had them. It was a dangerous game...Saddam thought the US was bluffing and he paid the ultimate price for that.



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

Rock_on_2008 on 27 July 2008

America would have to bomb Iran back into the Stone Age.



SamuelRSmith on 27 July 2008

I say do nothing. Perhaps prepare for the worst, but as a government, they should be doing that anyways, for every possible threat. Don't go in and attack Iran, though, unless they start threatening other countries.

Also, don't go making pacts with other countries, that's what turned Germany's invasion of Poland into WWII, afterall.



Around the Network
hasanraza on 27 July 2008
MrBubbles said:
Saddam wanted wmds, in the past tried to make them, and was acting like he had them. It was a dangerous game...Saddam thought the US was bluffing and he paid the ultimate price for that.

 

Before the war on iraq US use to say that iraq had weapens of mass destruction but what i believe after the war they couldnt even found one. The weapens they were talking about were used in the iran iraq war which were what sources say provided by US herself.



FINAL FANTASY VIII THE GREATEST GAME EVER

Rock_on_2008 on 27 July 2008

War on Iran or war on Iraq. America will kill the terrorists. BTW: I always thought Iran and Iraq was the same thing.



SamuelRSmith on 27 July 2008
hasanraza said:
MrBubbles said:
Saddam wanted wmds, in the past tried to make them, and was acting like he had them. It was a dangerous game...Saddam thought the US was bluffing and he paid the ultimate price for that.

 

Before the war on iraq US use to say that iraq had weapens of mass destruction but what i believe after the war they couldnt even found one. The weapens they were talking about were used in the iran iraq war which were what sources say provided by US herself.

The weapons of mass destruction in Iraq were a fabrication, used to get America into Iraq to take control of her oil. Making several US Politicians a lot of money.

 



hasanraza on 27 July 2008
SamuelRSmith said:
I say do nothing. Perhaps prepare for the worst, but as a government, they should be doing that anyways, for every possible threat. Don't go in and attack Iran, though, unless they start threatening other countries.

Also, don't go making pacts with other countries, that's what turned Germany's invasion of Poland into WWII, afterall.

 

 

 I agree with  SamuelRSmith on what he said about the war of iraq.He is also right that governments should be prepared for the worst keeping in mind what happened in the past(WW1 and WW2).



FINAL FANTASY VIII THE GREATEST GAME EVER

hasanraza on 27 July 2008
SamuelRSmith said:
hasanraza said:
MrBubbles said:
Saddam wanted wmds, in the past tried to make them, and was acting like he had them. It was a dangerous game...Saddam thought the US was bluffing and he paid the ultimate price for that.

 

Before the war on iraq US use to say that iraq had weapens of mass destruction but what i believe after the war they couldnt even found one. The weapens they were talking about were used in the iran iraq war which were what sources say provided by US herself.

The weapons of mass destruction in Iraq were a fabrication, used to get America into Iraq to take control of her oil. Making several US Politicians a lot of money.

 

Totally right the US politiciens made alot of money by sacrificing the blood of thousands of people from both sides.

 



FINAL FANTASY VIII THE GREATEST GAME EVER