ssj12 said:
Soleron said:
BottledSpringWater said:
FJ-Warez said: EVGA and XFX are leaving the nVidia camp, so probably they feature some sort of clearance sale... |
What?! Since when?
|
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/07/21/two-nvidia-partners-defect
The source is... only somewhat reliable, but the sentiment is accurate: Nvidia's partners are on the edge of failure and are likely to, if not defect outright, then at least begin to diversify into AMD boards, or more importantly Intel.
Intel, you say? Yes, they are working on a high-end discrete GPU codenamed Larrabee to be released in 2009 that is intended to compete with AMD and Nvidia, and they need board partners so are willing to give big margins to them to entice them.
|
since X58 supports both SLi and CrossFireX I dont see any issues with this since if they make intel boards they would be building boards that support both anyways.
edit: actually never believe the inquirer.
edit 2: there are so many nVidia enthusists now that XFX and EVGA shouldnt have issues with selling their GPUs.
|
x58 alone doesn't support sli, it only supports sli if the company that produces the mainboard adds a pci express to pci express switch from nvidia, and as far as i know adding that chip removes crossifire compatibility.
So if you buy a board with x58 you will basically have to choose between crossfire or sli compatibility and the chances are that sli ones will be more expensive cause thay need an extra chip sold by nvidia.
that alone is probably not enough for them to leave nvidia, but in the past in times when ati had the superior offers we have allready seen a few nvidia exculsive partners (asus, msi, gigabyte...) to open up to ati too and produce boards based on chips of both companies. so i guess there is a chance in this chipset generation that a similar thing might happen again if ati based boards really sell much betetr than nvidia based boards.
about larrabee i am really unsure yet if it delivers what intel promises now, its not the first try of intel at producing a gfx chip and all trys till now failed in hig end sector(but for intel they probably didn't fail cause in the end they ended up in their chipset gfx, which reached a really high market share, think its 40-50% market share overall just nothing in high performance sector). Also I am not really convinced taht x86 is the right base for a highly specialised gfx chipset, x86 is a good for allround chips. but even for taht its probably not the best possible solution, there were a few better chip concepts in the past 20-30 years, but the thing why x86 is still on top is legacy support. (even intels itanium chip is currrently not looking like it can ever reach a noticable market share, and that again cause intel build itanium compleetly new without backward code compatibility)