^ We have a culprit here twesterm! D:

I haven´t been warned, then I think they are doing a good job...

Most of the problem people have threads made about them on the mods forum, where they can discuss certain actions made by users, and maybe what they should do about them in terms of bans or warnings.  But each mod has the right to ban each member if they see fit to, depending on what you do they will make the ban longer. 

But if a user has been banned and if they feel it was not right they can send a message to that mod or Naznatips with a new account and talk about the banning or the length of it.  I know this is what i have done in the past and they have never had a problem with it.  This allows you to get a better understanding of the ban and the length of it, and sometimes they reduce the length of the ban. 

But if you create a second account just to continue posting on the forums they will perma ban the new account and might lengthen the ban on the main account.

@Griffin. Naznatips? I thought the head moderators on these boards were DKII and Ben.

no, actually not strict enough.

I waited a couple of weeks for an obvious troll account to get banned, every post he made was anti 360. After about 50 of the worst posts I have ever seen (his spelling and stuff was also horrific), he was banned.

But at least it happened.

People are distributing pronography on this site? For cheap?

A little haha. I mean only time I got banned was when a mod threatened me haha.

Actually, I'm more likely to lock this thread because of the annoying caps lock paragraph at the beginning than a dislike of the topic. I don't really care if people discuss this stuff to be honest.

Although I must agree with Montana, these threads inevitably oversimplify every example situation that is brought up. Often times members are unaware of information that the mods have and sometimes its just because people like to remember the situation in the most favorable light for themselves. Just ask any prison inmate if he is guilty and chances are he will explain how he was wrongly accused, framed, and then wrongly convicted...hell if you go by the criminal's account of events we have a prison system full of 99% innocent people, and justice system jokes aside that is obviously not true.

Unlike a normal member when a moderator sees someone make a questionable comment we don't get to just scroll past and have a nice day. No, moderators have to open the person's post history read through recent posts, look up their ban & warning history and read through it, and then make a determination of whether or not its an actionable offense.

And if that wasn't enough when we ban someone we have to figure out a way to best convey all of this information inside of a 1 or 2 sentence blurb (preferably along with post IDs and thread IDs) for the ban note. Then finally we go make a note of the infraction for other mods to see in case of future problems. And if that wasn't enough we also have to deal with complaints and bitching from people who think they are above the rules and can't believe that we would punish them because [insert lame reason].

In short, its a job. And I'm confident I speak for all of the mods when I say we would appreciate it if you guys would please just give us the benefit of the doubt. Contrary to paranoid logic the mods aren't out to get anyone who doesn't deserve it, and as many have echoed in this thread if anything we are a bit to lenient on people by issuing warnings to begin with. Most sites just ban without warning and usually for substantially longer periods of time.

are you seriously saying that those "Vs" threads were good....no offense, but 1 may have been okay, but the 17 that were made, got locked for a reason, spamming. sorry but there are rules for a reason.

Lolz!