.....Yeah....Give me either IGN or a 1up Review....
Former something....
We will see, who knows just maybe the PS3 version is better. Who knows, really.
There is definitely more to list that I want, but that's my main focus there.
The PS3 D-Pad is the far better 1. if you press right it only presses right unlike 360 1 where you dont know how many fucking buttons are pressed.
I think Zen makes a lot of sense, wait for IGN or Gamespot before declaring victory. If the graphical differences are minor then I'd rather purchase the cheaper system (360) to play the game. However, if the game play suffers (e.g. frame rate) then it's different story.
Many have said Burnout is better for PS3. I've copied and pasted a section of a Gamespot review for Burnout Paradise below.
"If you're looking for differences between the two versions, you won't find many. The PlayStation 3 version looks maybe a hair crisper than the 360 version, but that's about the only visual difference to speak of. On the flipside, the 360 version has a slight edge in that you can use custom soundtracks to drown out the miserable collection of songs EA has amassed for the game."
My question is at what point does it no longer matter? If things like these are all that separate the 360/PS3 versions of game X then I'm glad I got a 360 (... and a Wii).
I guess I'm going to be attacked now but that's alright cause I'm cool :)
| blazinhead89 said: The PS3 D-Pad is the far better 1. if you press right it only presses right unlike 360 1 where you dont know how many fucking buttons are pressed. |
so true
"Alright, time to put on line 2...*line 4*.....wtf, line 2....*line 1*....NO, line 2.....*goalie is pulled*"
Zen, I can see how you might say that the 360 might have better games (right now) but I do not see how you can say it is a better machine... between being a year older, RROD, no blu-ray, and inferior HW.
But if when you said better machine that was somehow a reference to games I can see.
Also, why was that dude banned? Is he a repeat offender?
End of 2009 Predictions (Set, January 1st 2009)
Wii- 72 million 3rd Year Peak, better slate of releases
360- 37 million Should trend down slightly after 3rd year peak
PS3- 29 million Sales should pick up next year, 3rd year peak and price cut
How is one version better than the other? Does PS3 offer higher resolution? Is 720p highest resolution for both games? How about Load times? Did they compare both versions loading? How bout the amount of Frame drops, did they account for that? Frankly the game was made by the same developer, with the biggest difference obviously Vader and Yoda. It's all speculated opinion after that
| bigjon said: Zen, I can see how you might say that the 360 might have better games (right now) but I do not see how you can say it is a better machine... between being a year older, RROD, no blu-ray, and inferior HW. But if when you said better machine that was somehow a reference to games I can see. Also, why was that dude banned? Is he a repeat offender? |
I dont think he is,
looking at his profile, it was only $40 ban fine, so i guess it is a shorter/smaller ban?
Soriku said:
Are you a (false) Sony advertiser? Anyway...uh...kudos to the PS3...I guess. The PS3 controls are better though =/ |
Soriku
The audio would be better since its uncompressed...I havn't heard anything bad about Vader, have heard most people prefer him over Yoda...Graphics are identicals since its a lead on both... the PS3 d pad owns the 360 d pad... so in a sense you envy the PS3...i see you always bashing the PS3 and making false comments
Must see IGN's Review before i judge.
End of 2008 Sales:
Wii- 39 Million 360- 25Million PS3- 22 Million
PSN: papasmurf5721![]()