By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Mascots:Xbox has Halo, Nintendo has Mario,Zelda, and Sony has...GT??

Sega= sonic
Nintendo= Mario
Microsoft= Master chief
Sony= crash bandicoot lol



Around the Network

joking aside though, the 2 companys with the most memorable mascots or gaming icons are nintendo and sega because they have been around longer

Nintendo has

mario (mario)
donkey kong (donkey kong)
link (zelda)
luigi (mario)
wario (mario)
kirby (kirby)
bowser (mario)

sega has

sonic (sonic)
akira (virtua fighter)
axel (streets of rage 2)
tails (sonic)
knuckles (sonic)
dr robotnic (sonic)
Ryo hazuki (Shenmue)

the truth of the matter is that nintendo and sega have many more gaming superstars that they OWN compared to microsoft or sony........

sega or nintendo ALONE have more icons than microsoft and sony COMBINED

in terms of icons that they actually OWN... sony ONLY have Kratos and microsoft ONLY have master chief

based on that alone nintendo and sega still RULE lol



Final-Fan said:

The fact that we're on Page 2 of this thread without a clear consensus emerging proves that the correct answer is "none".

At first, Sony tried to put Crash into the mascot position, but when that franchise faltered they never so much as tried to replace him as far as I can tell. Instead, they have the PlayStation brand in general, as KGB29 said, with an "elite" group of games sort of defining the brand; this group is always evolving, adding and dropping names, so it's not mascot material. GT, FF, GTA ... now maybe Resistance and KillZone among other possibilities. This is a big reason why losing FF exclusivity is such a blow to the PS3.

Sackboy would make a good mascot but I doubt it will happen. Only the craziest optimistic predictions -- if even those -- have LBP getting the kind of supermassive sales required to put it in the public consciousness like that in this generation. Even if Kratos had the awareness (which I seriously doubt since all his games combined have sold less than Halo 1), as others have noted he's not exactly family-friendly. SPARTAN 117 isn't really, either, but he doesn't seem as barbaric so I think people let it slide more. And Gran Turismo has no face.

(Perhaps part of the reason why Sony didn't develop a mascot after Crash was because:  (A) they don't have as much in the way of first-party stuff; (B) GT doesn't have a face; (C) the PS1 and PS2 were both massively popular so there was a lot of competition for "iconic game" status -- perhaps too hard for a game to pull ahead enough to become a mascot. (A) and (B) didn't apply to Nintendo or Sega, and (C) didn't apply to Microsoft. [edit:  with the exception of Halo -- and I consider the Xbox a special case -- it seems to me that most consoles which have developed mascots had the game in question as a pack-in.])

I'm gonna go with C.

Sony has plenty of first party stuff that could be mascots.  They just tend to develop new IPS rather than making the same stuff over and over again, so they never gain the notoriety of other franchises.  Not to mention they are usually lost in a sea of games (something that hasn't happened so far this gen with games like Resistance).   They're also usually not marketed very well.  Mario is well known becuase of his age.  Master Chief is well known because of Microsoft's intense marketing.  Sony's franchises, outside of GT, benefit from none of this.  God of War is really the only franchise that comes close, with Jak & Daxter and Ratchet & Clank a ways behind.

Jak & Daxter could've replaced Crash if they had been advertised more, but then Naughty Dog moved on to Uncharted, leaving J&D in the dust (hopefully not permanently). 

Sackboy has some real potential to become Sony's mascot, however, as they are REALLY pushing LBP this holiday season, and they will be selling actual sackboys along with the game.



insomniac is 2nd party... what is naughty dog? 1st or 2nd?



Respect for compans: SONY > NINTENDO >>>>>>>>>> MICROSOFT

 

Ronster316 said:

joking aside though, the 2 companys with the most memorable mascots or gaming icons are nintendo and sega because they have been around longer

Nintendo has

mario (mario)
donkey kong (donkey kong)
link (zelda)
luigi (mario)
wario (mario)
kirby (kirby)
bowser (mario)

sega has

sonic (sonic)
akira (virtua fighter)
axel (streets of rage 2)
tails (sonic)
knuckles (sonic)
dr robotnic (sonic)
Ryo hazuki (Shenmue)

the truth of the matter is that nintendo and sega have many more gaming superstars that they OWN compared to microsoft or sony........

sega or nintendo ALONE have more icons than microsoft and sony COMBINED

in terms of icons that they actually OWN... sony ONLY have Kratos and microsoft ONLY have master chief

based on that alone nintendo and sega still RULE lol

Jak & Daxter
Ratchet & Clank
Sly Cooper
Kratos
Helghast trooper

I could go on...

Oh, and then there's the newcomers this gen, like Nathan Drake and Nathan Hale.

Nintendo wins this hands down, but outside of Sonic, Sega isn't all that hot.

 



Around the Network
s-grandi93 said:
insomniac is 2nd party... what is naughty dog? 1st or 2nd?

 

1st.



Respect for companys with actual TALENT and make their OWN games.......

SEGA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SONY
NINTENDO>>>>>>>>>>>>> SONY



Ronster316 said:

joking aside though, the 2 companys with the most memorable mascots or gaming icons are nintendo and sega because they have been around longer

Nintendo has

mario (mario)
donkey kong (donkey kong)
link (zelda)
luigi (mario)
wario (mario)
kirby (kirby)
bowser (mario)

sega has

sonic (sonic)
akira (virtua fighter)
axel (streets of rage 2)
tails (sonic)
knuckles (sonic)
dr robotnic (sonic)
Ryo hazuki (Shenmue)

the truth of the matter is that nintendo and sega have many more gaming superstars that they OWN compared to microsoft or sony........

sega or nintendo ALONE have more icons than microsoft and sony COMBINED

in terms of icons that they actually OWN... sony ONLY have Kratos and microsoft ONLY have master chief

based on that alone nintendo and sega still RULE lol

I don't even know who most of those sega ones are, hardly anyone even owned a sega system or played some of those games you list.  Sony's list and massive fanbase destroys segas list.

 



are you comparing sonys to sega? ha ha ha

you say sega aint all that hot? ha ha ha

name some good games that sony actually MADE themselves over the years that are quality.....................

Sega made all of the following games and OWN the rights to them because they CREATED them..........

Sonic
Streets of rage
Virtua fighter
Virtua cop
Jet set radio
Fighting vipers
Virtua tennis
Sega rally
Daytona USA
NIGHTS
SHENMUE
Panzer dragoon
Crazy taxi
Virtua striker
Space channel 5
Shinobi
Golden axe and many many more.....

what did sony actually CREATE? god of war is in house so i will give them that.... but whatelse? SONY might be more sucessful now than sega because of sonys financial muscle, but in term of games that they created and actually OWN...... SEGA pawns SONY......



Ronster316 said:
Respect for companys with actual TALENT and make their OWN games.......

SEGA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SONY
NINTENDO>>>>>>>>>>>>> SONY

 

Are you serious?  Sony has over 19 internal development studios, in addtion to two second party studios.

All of these are internal:

Team ICO - Ico, Shadow of the Colossus
Naughty Dog - Jak & Daxter, Uncharted
Sony Santa Monica - God of War
Sony Japan - Ape Escape, Siren, LocoRoco
Incognito - Twisted Metal, Warhawk
Guerilla Games - Killzone
Polyphony Digital - Gran Turismo
Sony Liverpool - F1, Wipeout
Evolution Studios - MotorStorm
Zipper Interactive - Socom, MAG
Sony Bend - Syphon Filter, Resistance PSP
Clap Hanz - Hot Shots Golf

And these are second party (like Retro Studios, and like Rare once was):

Insomniac - Ratchet & Clank, Resistance
Sucker Punch - Sly Cooper, InFamous


There are more, but this list is getting a tad bit long, so I'll stop here.